From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-123459-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QRUcS-0004p3-Ct
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:28:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 798681C041;
	Tue, 31 May 2011 19:27:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC6A1C041
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:27:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so4879471wyi.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent
         :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        bh=8heDsCgCbm8FU5AJr/ZlXprkgFz8u3n0jGXW5YMrdgI=;
        b=BjAdoikARjuVngjKuJkIb/PbuSw1lurUtlFDgZMKAufHORlFL5Tf7bPEoPPleR8uaU
         5dVA3f7T1ET3KMvA3nFhyTKek2WHulZo3/NPPspVNZzs9BYh44ANYr01NfvjLWPtufQf
         FWYbHm3XdeIm8GS560TbYZm6ESphbHERPASn0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        b=KeY0kwyzNHaw1o2nNYBBM1Rm27c87BdHIX/NwaEzpjwMg7loni31y82BIlbSm/FX2O
         VQxd16bA0uJqJ3C3MMbeQ0TMoYfOryu4aSrnJ5oBg+NTeDo/sBgYpQjGdrB9Q8ejtX9a
         8DVqbHZUfMnL9ilfvZHUOlbB+4aOAbhkfVPTs=
Received: by 10.216.0.206 with SMTP id 56mr3862533web.112.1306870036194;
        Tue, 31 May 2011 12:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 74sm225820wem.17.2011.05.31.12.27.14
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 31 May 2011 12:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:27:42 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; )
References: <is1do3$bdf$1@dough.gmane.org> <BANLkTikCd_Xzyq0ZQ-pj4dyyeyq7ZOetFQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim4Tn8Zfg6qT774vEqiA66qxpwAvw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim4Tn8Zfg6qT774vEqiA66qxpwAvw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart3378339.ucq0drQy1g";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201105312027.53328.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 43f411b73f1324617d06182ea70f1ecd

--nextPart3378339.ucq0drQy1g
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday 31 May 2011 08:07:24 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 13:56, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>=20
wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
> >> Meh, I clicked 'Send' too fast.
> >>=20
> >> *My* suggested solution:
> >>=20
> >> Generate an initramfs containing udev. The hands-down easiest way is
> >> using genkernel's 'only create an initramfs' switch (sorry I forgot
> >> what exactly).
> >=20
> > good god no, please, anything but genkernel.
> >=20
> > That thing is an attempt to emulate binary distros which require an
> > initramfs to work properly (for any sane definition of "work") as the
> > person building the installer has no idea what hardware the user will
> > have. In Gentoo the user knows exactly what they have so there's no
> > need for a gigantic hardware-detecting workaround at boot time.
> >=20
> >> This needs to be done exactly once throughout the life of your VM.
> >>=20
> >> (To the herd of Gentoo graybeards, feel free to CMIIW)
> >=20
> > Or wait a few days for vapier's (posting under his other name of
> > spanky) sane advice to be implemented. His proposal is the sole voice
> > of reason in that bug thread....
>=20
> True. But I was having problem installing 2 servers on top of XenServer.
>=20
> So I cheated and ran 'genkernel initramfs' exactly once. At least I
> got myself a booting system. :-)
>=20
> When SpanKY's makedev gets stabilized and pushed to baselayout, I'll
> then happily ditch the genkernel cheat for my next VMs :-)

Are you sure that manually creating /dev/console and /dev/null isn't all th=
at=20
is required?  The rest of the devices will be created by udev when it runs =
at=20
boot time.

=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick

--nextPart3378339.ucq0drQy1g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk3lQTkACgkQVTDTR3kpaLacIgCfXRtmFOxwWRkW6Uu3oDQ+dlMl
HEAAn20/K9J9Jz4UJKoxft3K1C4ghMIM
=6rNH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3378339.ucq0drQy1g--