From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QPs23-0002fU-5V for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:04:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 635811C05C; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABCE1C05C for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1425624wyi.40 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 01:03:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=0JvVBchplBfVPrtXKVatK4gjNfNQPfzgsr6PXXQlR4c=; b=BKRACm8IFNT8UMAlzAeDK1JA7Q47Qyrd6imOcI/cZk3Y9KkMEjP6sRol0F90nRb6ZQ PrnyuNIKUElK8VkS4ZIN4a0PtaD2bnIsOQfkRukbykXHKHCv7R07ZKXMshYzqdS+PcL3 qShTADw0bjbOPPOtTwIf+Rw0tQPp810VhMSIY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=i3Pb1K6d7gLDDqXg72NLRrqGNXRihia4ZER8VdVYEii2JljkbU3j0CoZz+GwG1cex4 6C3Up0oL8eSI9lMsZ0Sr19W9vwtyx0JgIFQL4Q1iXLseGZHB2q8Wh6Wb0nXTO5c6mxOm /9RH82X7Ys6DETJaNEMvsCmuijXWZyZvHngQk= Received: by 10.216.236.208 with SMTP id w58mr6545634weq.62.1306483385374; Fri, 27 May 2011 01:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (dustpuppy.is.co.za [196.14.169.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id en1sm997986wbb.1.2011.05.27.01.03.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 May 2011 01:03:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ? Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 10:02:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-ck-r1; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105271002.18707.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 5747444ea9f149f1ddf1fe87511798ed Apparently, though unproven, at 07:07 on Friday 27 May 2011, Paul Hartman did opine thusly: > This is a new one to me. I've only been using kernel 2.6.39 (vanilla) > for a bit over a day. A few hours ago, this happened while I was away > from my computer: > > [150561.346968] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ? > [150562.060113] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ? > [150562.776438] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ? > [150563.491950] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ? > [150564.205886] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ? > [150564.922472] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ? > [150565.635036] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ? > > (this message repeated at this rate for 35 seconds in total) > > Weird... I don't know what it could be. Do you? Dunno either. But I'm having weird issues with 2.6.39 too - LibreOffice segfaults and kills my kdm session! Perhaps 2.6.39 is not as stable as we would like it to be ? -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com