From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QPKyt-00042W-Q1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:47:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33D711C039; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310301C039 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from luciole.localnet (unknown [93.163.65.162]) (Authenticated sender: stephane.guedon2) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 73D814B028B for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:39:20 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?St=E9phane_Guedon?= Organization: http://www.22decembre.eu To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] office softs Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:39:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37-tuxonice; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <201105252131.29898.stephane@22decembre.eu> <201105252220.00411.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201105252220.00411.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1719157.Io2bdj060m"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105252239.06137.stephane@22decembre.eu> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: a510d5c9a34c4aabd60b57324d51d8d3 --nextPart1719157.Io2bdj060m Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 25 May 2011 22:20:00 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:07 on Wednesday 25 May 2011, Paul > Hartman >=20 > did opine thusly: > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:31 PM, St=E9phane Guedon >=20 > wrote: > > > Hello > > >=20 > > > Some of you tried both LibreOffice / OpenOffice / Calligra recently ? > > >=20 > > > What do you think of them ? Which is stable / not yet fully finish ? > > > ... > >=20 > > They are both very mature and stable and should be able to do almost > > anything you need, as long as that need is not 100% MS-compatibility. > > ;) >=20 > LibreOffice comes with a huge benefit - I do not have to see the Oracle > logo on the splash screen. That alone was enough to make me switch. >=20 > Other than that, I reckon they are mostly on par with each other for the > average user. According to some recent blogs I scanned over, LibreOffice > ships with more templates or makes the process easier. I can see how many > people would like that a lot. I don't have oracle logo... (useless mail just to make fun) :-) =2D-=20 St=E9phane Guedon page web : http://www.22decembre.eu/ carte de visite : http://www.22decembre.eu/downloads/Stephane-Guedon.vcf cl=E9 publique gpg : http://www.22decembre.eu/downloads/Stephane-Guedon.asc --nextPart1719157.Io2bdj060m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAAECAAYFAk3daOoACgkQPJH+in8bwIOe8wP/YmCVcoOUVEMK43K/dRr1IspH ZajVRG+tbfYQNOIpGmQFE/iq7AjlJ1gcAn9mburDA/8lvwg2cKizP6xPn/p45Y8y PgTwW4ZHEahG1KtSKs+qMKurV/MmGo4NPt/eepgoDBU9ZPMjKHFSlhEy30zui1wM TVaaZDLUSo81XfK1khg= =KPTk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1719157.Io2bdj060m--