Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

[Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>]

Apparently, though unproven, at 21:01 on Wednesday 25 May 2011, Mick did opine 
thusly:

> On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:51:25 Mick wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
> > > opine
> > > 
> > > thusly:
> > > > Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package:
> > > > ====================================
> > > > 
> > > > >>> Emerging (1 of 10) dev-libs/eina-9999 from enlightenment
> > > 
> > > [snip]
> > > 
> > > > ../../src/include/eina_binbuf.h:209: note: previous declaration of
> > > > 'eina_binbuf_length_get' was here
> > > > eina_amalgamation.c:17936: error: redefinition of
> > > > '__STRBUF_MAGIC_STR' eina_amalgamation.c:1222: note: previous
> > > > definition of
> > > > '__STRBUF_MAGIC_STR' was here
> > > 
> > > FYI, this is fixed in svn now
> 
> I wonder if I can start using the 1.0.0 versions of enlightenment packages
> yet, or am I supposed to continue using everything from svn and not mix
> them?


I tried pegging my system at the 1.0.0 libs that are available, that didn't 
work too well.

The wm (e17 itself) is not released yet so unless you keep it at a snapshot 
made at the time of the 1.0.0 release you quickly encounter build failures. 
Same with the various apps in svn and all the third-party modules.

Seems like the releases were meant to be a (mostly) feature-complete snapshot 
that devs could use to test and evaluate and write apps for. Real world 
dictates that if you like to stay current you should either limit yourself to 
only those things released already, or keep everything at -9999

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com