From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QNqbT-0006hl-Kz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 21 May 2011 18:08:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B3471C09F; Sat, 21 May 2011 18:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from karnak.local (cpc2-lutn10-2-0-cust603.9-3.cable.virginmedia.com [81.97.90.92]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513621C09D for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 18:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karnak.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC113003 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 19:07:19 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at karnak.local Received: from karnak.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (karnak.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 917QQT8jqBfP for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 19:07:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from karnak.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karnak.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A84C3002 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 19:07:17 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 19:07:11 +0100 From: David W Noon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] RFC: Implementing a spamfiltering frontend Message-ID: <20110521190711.1d9ed32f@karnak.local> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Luton Operatic Society X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Ryr+lN8.iRUfXORkxU9kcsN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: fd78e3d100bdf5f6d626d203751b8d8f --Sig_/Ryr+lN8.iRUfXORkxU9kcsN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 21 May 2011 16:40:02 +0200, Andrea Conti wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] RFC: Implementing a spamfiltering frontend: [snip] >The problem with having two passes through postfix in the mail routing >chain is that you either run two separate postfix instances with >independent configurations or you have to figure out a robust way to >avoid loops. > >It can be done, it's just more difficult :) Actually, it is quite simple: you just configure a re-injection port in your original instance of Postfix. I have been running this arrangement for some few years now, and I use port 25 for the initial insertion of an email into Postfix and port 10025 for amavisd to re-insert the message after spam and virus scans have been completed. --=20 Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* dwnoon@ntlworld.com (David W Noon) *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* --Sig_/Ryr+lN8.iRUfXORkxU9kcsN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3X/1UACgkQc9/LpQ70v49pEQCfdnPTMTEmFoCyuDMxHZlXsFNB WRMAoJbBNt5pi06JFouv8H2nBcvbtJnn =vrKZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Ryr+lN8.iRUfXORkxU9kcsN--