From: Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is there an ati-drivers version which can coexist with the 2.6.39 kernel
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 08:28:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110520122816.GA24601@gaurahari.merseine.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gUvhE-7Sk-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:40:02PM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 11:20:05 PM, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> > Am 19.05.2011 22:32, schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > no current ati-driver can get along with the recent 2.6.39 kernel
> > > see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368081
> > >
> > > Does anybody know a work around?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > there are always the open drivers
> > x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati
> > and
> > x11-drivers/xf86-video-radeonhd
> >
> > If that is not a choice for you then you have to wait for an
> > (in-)offical patch or a version that works with .39
> >
> > Do you really need .39 now? Living on the bleeding edge comes with
> > problems of its own.
> >
>
> No, I don't NEED the 2.6.39, but I'll want to aid in testing and this
> version promises far better performance - on the file system as well as
> for concurrent processes since the big kernel lock has gone.
>
> The patches which have been posted recently, see
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368081
>
> seem to work (I'm just writing on a machine running 2.6.39 with 4 cores
> and the patched ati-driver)
>
Thanks for that info, Helmut. Later today I'm going to give 2.6.39 a
shot then (I'd masked it because of my ATI card).
--
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-20 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <gUiaJ-2sj-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gUiX8-3Pf-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gUvhE-7Sk-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-05-20 12:28 ` Indi [this message]
2011-05-19 20:32 [gentoo-user] Is there an ati-drivers version which can coexist with the 2.6.39 kernel Helmut Jarausch
2011-05-19 21:20 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-05-20 10:27 ` Helmut Jarausch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110520122816.GA24601@gaurahari.merseine.nu \
--to=thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox