From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-122978-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QMm3a-0002RS-7s
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:05:25 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0498E0484;
Wed, 18 May 2011 19:03:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93695E0441
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:03:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1852691wyi.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 12:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references
:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
:message-id;
bh=lDEDHKDp46JGnQVgq901pNDJZ1NY+KlgneOKk13UKeY=;
b=mhh0Wl9bwQnJ9XZfuVNjx972P2oUOemnfPZ8LKFVaYZZZoduLGgnptMthOfr0BC4Xd
4iQxMYCm8o7a75lRD4KNlFLe2KVMsYXDELD/RXiaMZdx/AKukw8WYGxYHerPGcA2CGxT
Kr4xaic/bY0Ja5AgpYOUbOwtHrH9qxFvMHHJ8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
b=I7CWJQWfgwLMKrb/xOsFqnEbOZe7uXUUxI1yZql44kWvIVUVXBc2BT6BH82V4AKV2w
6RW+0pkaQ+L7fOnZr77NG1EMMg0VcaY1QiEEfaoG13vHO5VL+myHTvhz07yC8ubI+bvr
cP5d4XNF/4iAAw5sKetQEQc/yz8tH0EgpsTso=
Received: by 10.216.231.198 with SMTP id l48mr1092950weq.54.1305745386657;
Wed, 18 May 2011 12:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-215-114-244.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.215.114.244])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g58sm920604wen.44.2011.05.18.12.03.04
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Wed, 18 May 2011 12:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:02:19 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-ck-r1; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; )
References: <BANLkTik1PPynP0U+9SpTjXycWN=DT73RHw@mail.gmail.com> <201105180046.18045.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <201105180743.43356.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201105180743.43356.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201105182102.20045.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 719564a317fc4fa8a96d74c3e289ef01
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:43 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
> > Very last comment here:
> > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/759
> > (ignore raster's anti-gentoo packager rants)
> >
> >
> >
> > Per your initial post, you have:
> >
> >
> > [ebuild R ] dev-libs/eeze-1.0.0 USE="nls -doc -static-libs" 0 kB [0]
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm certain you forgot to unmask eeze when it first hit the overlay
>
> Yes! That was it!
>
> I had unmasked it on the first machine, but not the second. I am confused
> though, shouldn't it come back and tell me that ezee was required as a
> dependency and it was masked?
There's a bug in the ebuild:
$ equery depends eeze
* These packages depend on eeze:
x11-wm/enlightenment-9999 (udev ? dev-libs/eeze)
(!hal ? dev-libs/eeze)
$
All other deps for efl packages specifically state version -9999 except this
one.
eeze is part of EFL and released as 1.0.0, so that dep is satisfied.
> Thank you very much! :)
>
> PS. You didn't say if icons for USB sticks disappear from your desktop
> when you unplug them.
Haven't used e17 much lately and almost never use icons on the desktop
(mount/umount in an xterm instead - old habit). But the google search that
found the thread above also found something that automounting was done by hal
in the past, that ehal is e17 code to interface with hal and it is
enabled/disabled at run time using detection routines. Plus a few other
snippets of info that led me to believe autodetection of devices doesn't work
reliably at this time without hal.
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com