From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-122946-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QMaV1-0002qu-30
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 06:44:51 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 542131C0C7;
Wed, 18 May 2011 06:43:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A99D1C0C7
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 06:43:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1232888wyi.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 23:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent
:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=KAqrCan17tv6rr0Pbu7WNEF0fGu9D9hrjoPCX/AyGMA=;
b=XsLlxl1Yz3t55S8FktvfTkr0h4RO3MGxvDThik5lv3BGuDdpJxvZ5vK533C9hfe2l5
o3Q4J1uk4Pu74n8tKmwiSKJmVQzl+KhvnhEihGiuj1NVDLu6xN2A/UIhMY7bG50Hb67o
fRmKI8YINlbrl/aRWASlZ+MdAeMHpo0ded54M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
b=bxm+ncaFd1F5CM5oCVFQZziawDO9Casu7fYGzVlxm432pkkEvkHdAiDfgzVuaAy8sn
xFTkqvwXrXxUzrqZD9Ibbf4/GHXYUnjGSRHyrs0M1tqfmq76K8g2hgvkJEiYnSjWrpqI
ykerFZ85WGIw9xT8VGENqLXgW8kgYtxgQq6ao=
Received: by 10.216.221.29 with SMTP id q29mr4258052wep.6.1305700987151;
Tue, 17 May 2011 23:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o6sm624041wep.41.2011.05.17.23.43.06
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 17 May 2011 23:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 07:43:41 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.37-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; )
References: <BANLkTik1PPynP0U+9SpTjXycWN=DT73RHw@mail.gmail.com> <201105172322.18027.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <201105180046.18045.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201105180046.18045.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart6354168.4YIezWiDi4";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201105180743.43356.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: ef3cbe00bb4910567e671b4699436a77
--nextPart6354168.4YIezWiDi4
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 23:46:17 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 00:22 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did
> opine
>=20
> thusly:
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
> > >=20
> > > opine thusly:
> > > > On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I compared by USE to yours and they are much the same apart from ofono
> > > (not relevant) and I have ukit enabled.
> > >=20
> > > You are running x86 (32 bit) right?
> >=20
> > Yes, this is a x86 mostly stable box (except for e17 of course).
>=20
> Ha! I believe we found the little fucker causing you grief.
>=20
> Very last comment here:
> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/759
> (ignore raster's anti-gentoo packager rants)
>=20
> Per your initial post, you have:
>=20
> [ebuild R ] dev-libs/eeze-1.0.0 USE=3D"nls -doc -static-libs" 0 kB [=
0]
>=20
> I'm certain you forgot to unmask eeze when it first hit the overlay
Yes! That was it!
I had unmasked it on the first machine, but not the second. I am confused=
=20
though, shouldn't it come back and tell me that ezee was required as a=20
dependency and it was masked?
Thank you very much! :)
PS. You didn't say if icons for USB sticks disappear from your desktop when=
=20
you unplug them.
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick
--nextPart6354168.4YIezWiDi4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk3Tap8ACgkQVTDTR3kpaLbv7gCg8QtmHQUMtXiJ9Zh8r7RBd4D3
fH4An2pmnIZ5DfwzeYk7/toxKVmV6dlK
=Rz8Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart6354168.4YIezWiDi4--