From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QKhbS-00038b-7z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:55:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6170AE04ED; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDA1E04ED for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so1006355gyh.40 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:54:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3qaUYg5izduLpNbxEdvwjVTXEbdib+Wml7y/1f3OyJg=; b=fxfpEkJraImK5PFFKjwBZDM5LBJuksgt+EUMP1DH+ifZC647RWYSpEGY7VgZLFRW35 3qxx8W/dWaJf4fQvyMzWByFAwt7uigKh8yQGjobcgLL4/fHKYrIKAbUu70rdDveTcp/o bB7GWnu3/NHH+K6rYSeODyHWNP75RIQ97SGTw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=bisP+4KLWtnivUiGy98tNgmO2ZYi9/aUzC4MiRqRGxNem/3960FIJ8emXd1RKIiXBB r4o4nXYGwt2jS7VYUWGVb9xcoCZcXQjiloSq2dbF6BbK4/oHgjVGhMkR50jL5x0Royar xwyhUMY4un3qdTeqgkdpEgXZ6VSjeAEHfliOk= Received: by 10.91.149.5 with SMTP id b5mr871839ago.91.1305251661696; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gaurahari (adsl-72-152-84-26.asm.bellsouth.net [72.152.84.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d20sm1252522ang.17.2011.05.12.18.54.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 May 2011 18:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 21:54:14 -0400 From: Indi To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Will the next auto-build stage tar ball include OpenRC update? Message-ID: <20110513015414.GA3960@gaurahari> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c6e6484c0681e6ae748b834b284b3197 On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 03:40:01AM +0200, =E5=88=98=E5=8B=87=E6=B3=B0 wro= te: > 2011/5/12 Thanasis <[1]thanasis@asyr.hopto.org> >=20 > on 05/12/2011 03:43 PM Indi wrote the following: >=20 > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote: > >> On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote: > >>> =E4=B8=AA=E4=BA=BA=E7=BB=8F=E5=8E=86=EF=BC=8Cbaselayout=E7=9A=84= =E6=9B=B4=E6=96=B0=E5=85=B6=E5=AE=9E=E9=83=BD=E4=B8=8D=E6=80=8E=E4=B9=88s= uffer,=E5=91=B5=E5=91=B5=EF=BD=9E > >> > >> huh? > >> > > > > It surely does look cool though, wish I could read and write in su= ch > > a picturesque manner. :) > > >=20 > The wonders of UTF8 ... the topic of another thread .... :) >=20 >=20 > Can Chinese character be displayed correctly when there is no zh* > setting in LINGUAS variant? >=20 You'd be more qualified to answer that than I, but I=20 think so. Everything appears to work for me after=20 defining en_US.UTF-8 and switching the fonts to Deja=20 Vu Sans Mono, but as I am illiterate in Asian languages=20 that may be assuming a lot. :) --=20 caveat utilitor=20 =E2=99=AB =E2=9D=A4 =E2=99=AB =E2=9D=A4 =E2=99=AB =E2=9D=A4 =E2=99=AB=20