public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] Update nvidia-drivers
@ 2011-05-12  3:17 meino.cramer
  2011-05-12  6:53 ` [gentoo-user] " Hartmut Figge
  2011-05-12  8:52 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: meino.cramer @ 2011-05-12  3:17 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Gentoo

Hi,

this morning there was an update to nvidia-drivers-270.41.06.

After running dmesg I found this:

    ioremap error for 0x9a000-0x9b000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
    ioremap error for 0xcfe90000-0xcfe91000, requested 0x10, got 0x0

I dont know, whether this is related to that update...

In the context of the output of dmesg it looks like:

    nvidia 0000:08:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 24 (level, low) -> IRQ 24
    nvidia 0000:08:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
    vgaarb: device changed decodes: PCI:0000:08:00.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=none:owns=io+mem
    NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  270.41.06  Mon Apr 18 14:53:56 PDT 2011
    microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x10000bf
    microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x10000bf
    microcode: CPU2: patch_level=0x10000bf
    microcode: CPU3: patch_level=0x10000bf
    microcode: CPU4: patch_level=0x10000bf
    microcode: CPU5: patch_level=0x10000bf
    microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
    EXT4-fs (sda11): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
    EXT4-fs (sda5): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
    EXT4-fs (sda6): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
    EXT4-fs (sda7): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
    EXT4-fs (sda8): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
    EXT4-fs (sda9): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
    EXT4-fs (sda10): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
    EXT4-fs (sda3): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
    EXT4-fs (sda12): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
    sky2 0000:05:00.0: eth1: enabling interface
    sky2 0000:05:00.0: eth1: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex, flow control both
    sky2 0000:05:00.0: eth1: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex, flow control both
    Adding 6291452k swap on /dev/sda2.  Priority:-1 extents:1 across:6291452k
    ioremap error for 0x9a000-0x9b000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
    ioremap error for 0xcfe90000-0xcfe91000, requested 0x10, got 0x0


Is this something to care of? And if "yes" -- what do I have to fix
where ?

Thank you very much for any help! :)

Best regards
mcc




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-user] Re: Update nvidia-drivers
  2011-05-12  3:17 [gentoo-user] Update nvidia-drivers meino.cramer
@ 2011-05-12  6:53 ` Hartmut Figge
  2011-05-12  7:04   ` Hartmut Figge
  2011-05-12  8:52 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hartmut Figge @ 2011-05-12  6:53 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

meino.cramer@gmx.de:

> this morning there was an update to nvidia-drivers-270.41.06.

I am back to 270.41.03 because dosemu caused a high load and games with
it acted poorly. Haven't investigated further.

Hartmut
-- 
Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/
Von Usern fuer User  :-)




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-user] Re: Update nvidia-drivers
  2011-05-12  6:53 ` [gentoo-user] " Hartmut Figge
@ 2011-05-12  7:04   ` Hartmut Figge
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hartmut Figge @ 2011-05-12  7:04 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Hartmut Figge:

> I am back to 270.41.03 because dosemu caused a high load...

dosbox, not dosemu. ;)

Hartmut
-- 
Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/
Von Usern fuer User  :-)




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Update nvidia-drivers
  2011-05-12  3:17 [gentoo-user] Update nvidia-drivers meino.cramer
  2011-05-12  6:53 ` [gentoo-user] " Hartmut Figge
@ 2011-05-12  8:52 ` Dale
  2011-05-12 13:27   ` Xiangru Chen
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dale @ 2011-05-12  8:52 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this morning there was an update to nvidia-drivers-270.41.06.
>
> After running dmesg I found this:
>
>      ioremap error for 0x9a000-0x9b000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
>      ioremap error for 0xcfe90000-0xcfe91000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
>
> I dont know, whether this is related to that update...
>
> In the context of the output of dmesg it looks like:
>
>      nvidia 0000:08:00.0: PCI INT A ->  GSI 24 (level, low) ->  IRQ 24
>      nvidia 0000:08:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
>      vgaarb: device changed decodes: PCI:0000:08:00.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=none:owns=io+mem
>      NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  270.41.06  Mon Apr 18 14:53:56 PDT 2011
>      microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x10000bf
>      microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x10000bf
>      microcode: CPU2: patch_level=0x10000bf
>      microcode: CPU3: patch_level=0x10000bf
>      microcode: CPU4: patch_level=0x10000bf
>      microcode: CPU5: patch_level=0x10000bf
>      microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00<tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
>      EXT4-fs (sda11): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
>      EXT4-fs (sda5): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>      EXT4-fs (sda6): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>      EXT4-fs (sda7): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>      EXT4-fs (sda8): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>      EXT4-fs (sda9): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>      EXT4-fs (sda10): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>      EXT4-fs (sda3): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>      EXT4-fs (sda12): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>      sky2 0000:05:00.0: eth1: enabling interface
>      sky2 0000:05:00.0: eth1: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex, flow control both
>      sky2 0000:05:00.0: eth1: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex, flow control both
>      Adding 6291452k swap on /dev/sda2.  Priority:-1 extents:1 across:6291452k
>      ioremap error for 0x9a000-0x9b000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
>      ioremap error for 0xcfe90000-0xcfe91000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
>
>
> Is this something to care of? And if "yes" -- what do I have to fix
> where ?
>
> Thank you very much for any help! :)
>
> Best regards
> mcc
>
>    

I get one of those in mine too.

root@fireball / # dmesg | grep ioremap
[   31.812410] ioremap error for 0xbfcf3000-0xbfcf4000, requested 0x10, 
got 0x0
root@fireball / #

I'm using nvidia-drivers-260.19.44 so at least one of those applies to a 
different series.  You are not completely alone here.  Let's hope it is 
not a serious problem or even a problem at all. The rest of dmesg looks 
normal to me.

Dale

:-)  :-)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Update nvidia-drivers
  2011-05-12  8:52 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
@ 2011-05-12 13:27   ` Xiangru Chen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xiangru Chen @ 2011-05-12 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3110 bytes --]

Hi,

I'm using nvidia-drivers-270.41.03 and got those too.

"ioremap error for 0xbf7ef000-0xbf7f0000, requested 0x10, got 0x0"

Regards

--
Xiangru Chen


On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:

> meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this morning there was an update to nvidia-drivers-270.41.06.
>>
>> After running dmesg I found this:
>>
>>     ioremap error for 0x9a000-0x9b000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
>>     ioremap error for 0xcfe90000-0xcfe91000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
>>
>> I dont know, whether this is related to that update...
>>
>> In the context of the output of dmesg it looks like:
>>
>>     nvidia 0000:08:00.0: PCI INT A ->  GSI 24 (level, low) ->  IRQ 24
>>     nvidia 0000:08:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
>>     vgaarb: device changed decodes:
>> PCI:0000:08:00.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=none:owns=io+mem
>>     NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  270.41.06  Mon Apr 18
>> 14:53:56 PDT 2011
>>     microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x10000bf
>>     microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x10000bf
>>     microcode: CPU2: patch_level=0x10000bf
>>     microcode: CPU3: patch_level=0x10000bf
>>     microcode: CPU4: patch_level=0x10000bf
>>     microcode: CPU5: patch_level=0x10000bf
>>     microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00<tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
>> Peter Oruba
>>     EXT4-fs (sda11): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
>>     EXT4-fs (sda5): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts:
>> (null)
>>     EXT4-fs (sda6): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts:
>> (null)
>>     EXT4-fs (sda7): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts:
>> (null)
>>     EXT4-fs (sda8): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts:
>> (null)
>>     EXT4-fs (sda9): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts:
>> (null)
>>     EXT4-fs (sda10): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts:
>> (null)
>>     EXT4-fs (sda3): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts:
>> (null)
>>     EXT4-fs (sda12): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts:
>> (null)
>>     sky2 0000:05:00.0: eth1: enabling interface
>>     sky2 0000:05:00.0: eth1: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex, flow
>> control both
>>     sky2 0000:05:00.0: eth1: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex, flow
>> control both
>>     Adding 6291452k swap on /dev/sda2.  Priority:-1 extents:1
>> across:6291452k
>>     ioremap error for 0x9a000-0x9b000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
>>     ioremap error for 0xcfe90000-0xcfe91000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
>>
>>
>> Is this something to care of? And if "yes" -- what do I have to fix
>> where ?
>>
>> Thank you very much for any help! :)
>>
>> Best regards
>> mcc
>>
>>
>>
>
> I get one of those in mine too.
>
> root@fireball / # dmesg | grep ioremap
> [   31.812410] ioremap error for 0xbfcf3000-0xbfcf4000, requested 0x10, got
> 0x0
> root@fireball / #
>
> I'm using nvidia-drivers-260.19.44 so at least one of those applies to a
> different series.  You are not completely alone here.  Let's hope it is not
> a serious problem or even a problem at all. The rest of dmesg looks normal
> to me.
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-)
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3882 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-12 13:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-12  3:17 [gentoo-user] Update nvidia-drivers meino.cramer
2011-05-12  6:53 ` [gentoo-user] " Hartmut Figge
2011-05-12  7:04   ` Hartmut Figge
2011-05-12  8:52 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
2011-05-12 13:27   ` Xiangru Chen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox