From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-122484-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QKB2G-0007SR-6D
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:09:12 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AFF21C167;
	Wed, 11 May 2011 15:06:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yi0-f53.google.com (mail-yi0-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD071C14B
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:06:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yia25 with SMTP id 25so253732yia.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
         :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
         :in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=M3PzlL0Xe8bzI2fe47Ly3ooDBLJ5y42bG/1+yjUOGXU=;
        b=vZrADM2ma3pOVbQK46/6VOvG25cC/7ceVkQE0AkpnLoNvaqXgMQHNymsgXU25ktIPf
         Hq2a+7hFEcS/VrlP1wQwXGP+YnG7sEkAnSCokUaQbMNyAEgmzwg0WM2+ukLFk4pm5gAg
         1IpIMpQ17G/o9qwckXAxwA/8PfsJgoLvTO2ts=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        b=arSt+SmQPi33PLZtop/ACqI45jQvgUrrvcwyWsV4ZXeYdiVisSkAMP9R8HpXFUtmrv
         PPDRNshzXkI1+Pk2/FMPCcJhVR258MXM+vQOIL7ujinj5svcILrPJpiMFthr7KtW2OIn
         lKHOkQY4b+pYPkRIrpnJWpJtOs2OHDbmYuL24=
Received: by 10.100.241.1 with SMTP id o1mr5816405anh.128.1305126368584;
        Wed, 11 May 2011 08:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gaurahari (adsl-72-152-84-26.asm.bellsouth.net [72.152.84.26])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g37sm79133anj.2.2011.05.11.08.06.06
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 11 May 2011 08:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:06:02 -0400
From: Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How's the openrc update going for everyone?
Message-ID: <20110511150602.GA2423@gaurahari>
References: <gR38f-7ah-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
 <gRfM6-3mo-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
 <gRhXz-72p-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
 <gRiTE-aT-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <gRiTE-aT-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: fb59a951eb95e802f8118c24b6be32a3

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:50:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> 
> It uses hardly any cpu at all, regardless of what the naysayers say. 
> 

Well, add me to the "naysayers" list then, because my experience directly
contradicts that statement. Much happier with fluxbox, completely finished 
fooling with the kde.

I still don't understand why the kde folks went from something that
worked extremely well to their current state. Baffling.

-- 
caveat utilitor