Re: [gentoo-user] heads-up: 2011-05-01 baselayout news

[Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 2816 bytes --]

On Thursday 05 May 2011 09:25:18 Alex Schuster wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > On Monday 02 May 2011 12:52:12 Alex Schuster wrote:
> > > Mick writes:
> > > > Thanks.  Not sure if there is a difference between an env.d variable
> > > > and a profile.d variable.
> > > 
> > > None you will notice, both /etc/profile.env and scripts in
> > > /etc/profile.d/ are sourced in /etc/profile. profile.env contains all
> > > stuff in /etc/env.d/ after you ran env-update.
> > 
> > Hmm ... I initially set up a file in /etc/profile.d/99editor with
> > 
> > EDITOR="/usr/bin/vim"
> > 
> > in it.  Upon reboot I still got:
> > 
> > echo $EDITOR
> > /bin/nano
> 
> I looked into /etc/profile, and right at the bottom it does this:
> 
> for sh in /etc/profile.d/*.sh ; do
>         [ -r "$sh" ] && . "$sh"
> done
> unset sh
> 
> So the file needs to have the .sh suffix.

I see!  It makes sense now.


> > So, I thought of moving it into /etc/env.d/97editor.  Upon another reboot
> > (troubleshooting network problems) I again found out that nano is my
> > default editor ... neither locations seem to being read at boot time?
> > 
> > Running env-update && source /etc/profile did not make any difference.
> > 
> > Is the number prefix important?  Does it have to be 99editor?  If so, how
> > does one discover the correct number for each variable?
> 
> Maybe the 99 is what eselect wants the number to be. If you manage files in
> there yourself, I think it should not matter. The result of env-update in
> /etc/profile.env is sorted alphabetically, so the order of file in
> /etc/env.d should not matter, I think.
> 
> > > I do not manually change things in env.d, but with 'eselect editor set
> > > <n>' you can create a file /etc/env.d/99editor which will set the
> > > EDITOR variable to the editor you gave eselect as argument. Enter
> > > eselect editor list to se what's available, or just give the editor
> > > path as argument to eselect.
> > 
> > # eselect editor list
> > 
> > Available targets for the EDITOR variable:
> >   [1]   /bin/nano
> >   [2]   /usr/bin/ex
> >   [3]   /usr/bin/vi
> >   [ ]   (free form)
> > 
> > What does the "[ ]   (free form)" above refer to?
> 
> That you can specify any other binary as editor if you like, with "eselect
> editor set /path/to/my/editor".
> 
> > > > I've added mine to /etc/profile.d for now.  I'll
> > > > see what gives when I reboot.
> > > 
> > > A relogin would be enough. Or '. /etc/profile' in the shell, this is
> > > what eselects suggests to do. Or bash -l, or xterm -ls.

Yes, but I was also testing some other issues with my network setup and also 
startup scripts.

> > Yep, setting the EDITOR using eselect works fine.
> 
> Hooray!

 :)  Thanks for your advice!

-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]