From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QHWcK-0000QI-Aj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 07:35:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9343E0484; Wed, 4 May 2011 07:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90410E0484 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 07:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8AE48040E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 08:33:44 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 08:33:38 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] No system list Message-ID: <20110504083338.69b09fb5@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1304469797.32346.23.camel@troll> References: <1304469797.32346.23.camel@troll> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs18 (GTK+ 2.24.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/sW7L4T_HZ910gjzdgGHNTLo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c8c9dc7bcbb2ba5f1637d0d83173d982 --Sig_/sW7L4T_HZ910gjzdgGHNTLo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:43:17 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > I have a few older systems (~6-10 years in use) that have no system > list. Over the years there have been various disasters and methods of > managing the software with the result that I have had to run regenworld > amongst other things. @system is defined in the profile. Have you updated the profile on these machines? If not, it is possible that the profile they are set to useno longer exists. What does "eselect profile list" show? --=20 Neil Bothwick It's no use crying over spilt milk -- it only makes it salty for the cat. --Sig_/sW7L4T_HZ910gjzdgGHNTLo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3BAVcACgkQum4al0N1GQPvDwCgtpvdIFVoQgbZ0fygeCPAWhCY 8vwAoIKqGBG+MU0pC3DZDD+gy3nOrfDJ =7Rc4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/sW7L4T_HZ910gjzdgGHNTLo--