From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QHAjo-0007vT-0m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 08:13:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 433041C024; Tue, 3 May 2011 08:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098EB1C024 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 08:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A47DEE82 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:12:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6N9pTk37VS5I for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:12:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.localnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8634DEE31 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:12:04 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Kompozer: undefined reference to `SEC_ASN1Encode_Util' Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 09:12:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201104271808.42427.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <201105022012.11643.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <201105022118.11798.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201105022118.11798.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105030912.04292.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e93e016d2d4e4aec0549c3b8cf53f332 On Monday 02 May 2011 21:18:00 Mick wrote: > A bit O/T to the original post, but how does kompozer compares to > Komodo-edit? I was too terse a moment ago. I haven't seen Komodo-edit, but from the list of features on Softpedia's site it seems to omit the one thing I use Kompozer for: WYSIWYG style editing. It's extremely useful to be able to see the effect on a web page of a small change in a style definition - the instant the change goes in. No before-and- after comparisons, no unnoticed effects on other style elements. For content editing I prefer BlueFish, but when I approached a site redesign idea the other day I realised I'd be lost without Kompozer. It really is that good. It does have bugs, but most of those can be evaded by following Greg Tutor's tutorials on the web. It also needs a lot more development effort. HTH. -- Rgds Peter