From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QEbTZ-0002WT-Vo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:10:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3342E1C004; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BBE1C004 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so251971wwj.10 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:08:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=svrHVEYzOiRCwx2gNFnN1LoEuTemXxvkXEgeGUs6crw=; b=iu+laN6Z513JEq9zggglbhV20ot7pWrEz5ybK/WInqGklGKqOsgCqIwLo7Q1EOTxCn Ov3UCVbt2ZYYRYVAsXQkAgfk5ZoxMFAwnjJWdJxFBprRje/fFKQDUWSUnEMHmCOgnw2L 10jBYeI/nTObdL4Q44peUBrJMMpH8kXCAsYjY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=k3o/YkdfOvClrDPOhkBgldNggwSHYSSywCvCG0QFl5zzn8lBhq6gJptJJTR14yDROo I0S84dXPns1Ra1CM7dxLQl/AudEO7SqnJom2FA1QR5CVcuEsqFsYRJCB2k1NW/ADW9AV 6J6Ax/zvTbtIIpm1H1lQKqiVANGD9iHhoLog0= Received: by 10.216.67.135 with SMTP id j7mr4552761wed.54.1303798103028; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bd8sm3627875wbb.14.2011.04.25.23.08.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:08:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT router advice] a router capable of detailed logs Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:08:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <878vv69asl.fsf@newsguy.com> <201104251945.16273.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4DB5F44B.9050005@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB5F44B.9050005@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4317723.NvKdM3MS3R"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201104260708.54328.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 23f763229f51e4de8a53ef6f888223ac --nextPart4317723.NvKdM3MS3R Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 25 April 2011 23:23:07 Jake Moe wrote: > I haven't followed this entire thread, but is there any chance this > isn't really a "Cisco" device as you know it, but a rebranded > "Linksys"? After seeing a picture of the device, and reading that it's > a "Small Business" router, I'd suspect it's a device that came out of > their acquisition of Linksys. That'd explain the different config style > you're seeing. Snap! I was about to say that from what Harry's describing this is more of a chea= per=20 'cisco appliance' than a cisco router. Linksys is a very probable candidat= e. =20 In that case you may be able to blast the firmware and install OpenWRT and = the=20 like. Check the chipset first for hardware compatibility to make sure you= =20 won't brick it! =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart4317723.NvKdM3MS3R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk22YXYACgkQVTDTR3kpaLYFgACeNxrV/BraAlT3TTEq6k2okDXU jNwAnj5HwldnZSNJ62QsC2pe/WfxQu3G =J0pN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4317723.NvKdM3MS3R--