From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QE7cr-0006AD-ER for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:17:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13F4C1C012; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45C11C012 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1824745wyi.40 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 15:16:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=vFM+mv1pZ5Y0/HrLJ4kHWgeG9/BNw7x3hDfYCqy4nYg=; b=KTPc6pLXr9CKLAM9pFBPtjv6um/IWeJj+MCHMO2WsNFls2G2rMM2G/gT1WE6++vYUi /WtMGhntSpcQE+b1CKb8NZXPad0YRLY9pQTnTu55Sx+J9dkrX9otpYdJJ/ENpQ058pEL bNB+gQlUhXkZqixEjXaxKElnQAI88nTEk2uJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=lInCSeP45g9griMs2ZVoxlQq7keJI68B1QWEeIfBG75hg6WUjqmB5hDZHIYuTjVI5z E7HrDWLSYFsiYdIIAlkFZuZWSnHEdrKiSd2lFQ09q+tepFkj43480t6wyyhSib+s1b8m oLrmoyDcD8veku7l8XjdTPpFNHtjjAK6Vdi6Y= Received: by 10.227.202.139 with SMTP id fe11mr3177780wbb.169.1303683382768; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 15:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h11sm2962192wbc.9.2011.04.24.15.16.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Apr 2011 15:16:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Reinstall Gentoo? [Was: Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please!] Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:16:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110424211723.0138d8b3@karnak.local> <20110424213033.5bbe20f8@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110424213033.5bbe20f8@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2017339.FIfz5JDatO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201104242316.50570.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 689ab40f76fd7f991136bc2b12da8766 --nextPart2017339.FIfz5JDatO Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 24 April 2011 21:30:33 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:17:23 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > > >Doing this today I've had a couple of packages that needed to be > > >emerged with USE=3D-doc when they failed. > >=20 > > Those would be jinja and sphinx. They are notorious for their circular > > dependency, which requires USE=3D'-doc' to bypass. >=20 > It's rarely desirable to enable doc globally. It is best to enable only > for those packages where you need extended documentation. @Alan Mackenzie: What Neil is saying can be achieved by setting package specific USE flags i= n=20 the file /etc/portage/package.use; e.g. use an entry like: dev-python/jinja -doc i18n to exclude USE flag "doc", but include "i18n". =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart2017339.FIfz5JDatO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk20oVIACgkQVTDTR3kpaLZcAgCffctgReTPVL49bxmyhg/Pi13A ibEAoNOF3P+Y4ZAxGwk9pEwfvapsiCoY =0B1v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2017339.FIfz5JDatO--