public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1"
@ 2011-04-24  4:32 Dale
  2011-04-24  7:01 ` Alan McKinnon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dale @ 2011-04-24  4:32 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Well, I synced and got this interesting message:

root@fireball / # emerge -uvDNp world

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!

emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1".
(dependency required by "kde-base/kjots-4.5.95" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "kde-base/kdepim-meta-4.5.95" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "kde-base/kde-meta-4.6.2[semantic-desktop]" 
[installed])
(dependency required by "@selected" [set])
(dependency required by "@world" [argument])
root@fireball / #

So, it is not masked or keyworded, it just plain ain't there.  Since 
this is unstable, should I report it as a bug or wait on the Raid to 
show up on it's own?

Dale

:-)  :-)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1"
  2011-04-24  4:32 [gentoo-user] no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1" Dale
@ 2011-04-24  7:01 ` Alan McKinnon
  2011-04-24  7:30   ` Dale
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2011-04-24  7:01 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Apparently, though unproven, at 06:32 on Sunday 24 April 2011, Dale did opine 
thusly:

> Well, I synced and got this interesting message:
> 
> root@fireball / # emerge -uvDNp world
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> 
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1".
> (dependency required by "kde-base/kjots-4.5.95" [ebuild])
> (dependency required by "kde-base/kdepim-meta-4.5.95" [ebuild])
> (dependency required by "kde-base/kde-meta-4.6.2[semantic-desktop]"
> [installed])
> (dependency required by "@selected" [set])
> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
> root@fireball / #
> 
> So, it is not masked or keyworded, it just plain ain't there.  Since
> this is unstable, should I report it as a bug or wait on the Raid to
> show up on it's own?

so is it kjots from the kde overlays that's doing it?

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1"
  2011-04-24  7:01 ` Alan McKinnon
@ 2011-04-24  7:30   ` Dale
  2011-04-24  9:14     ` Alan McKinnon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dale @ 2011-04-24  7:30 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 06:32 on Sunday 24 April 2011, Dale did opine
> thusly:
>
>    
>> Well, I synced and got this interesting message:
>>
>> root@fireball / # emerge -uvDNp world
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>>
>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1".
>> (dependency required by "kde-base/kjots-4.5.95" [ebuild])
>> (dependency required by "kde-base/kdepim-meta-4.5.95" [ebuild])
>> (dependency required by "kde-base/kde-meta-4.6.2[semantic-desktop]"
>> [installed])
>> (dependency required by "@selected" [set])
>> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
>> root@fireball / #
>>
>> So, it is not masked or keyworded, it just plain ain't there.  Since
>> this is unstable, should I report it as a bug or wait on the Raid to
>> show up on it's own?
>>      
> so is it kjots from the kde overlays that's doing it?
>
>    

I don't have any overlays on here that I know of, unless portage did 
something fancy that I'm not aware of.  It appears that something got 
moved into the tree but maybe one ebuild got missed.  That's the reason 
for my post and the question.  Am I correct or is there something fishy 
on my system?  I did wait a few hours and sync again, just in case I got 
it in the middle of the change or something.  This is the correct 
command for listing local overlays correct?

root@fireball / # layman -l
root@fireball / #

If that is correct, I shouldn't have any overlays.  I don't want to file 
a bug and it be me. < red face >  If the tree has a boo boo, I'd like to 
report it so it can get fixed otherwise someone else will run into this 
little error.

Dale

:-)  :-)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1"
  2011-04-24  7:30   ` Dale
@ 2011-04-24  9:14     ` Alan McKinnon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2011-04-24  9:14 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user; +Cc: Dale

Apparently, though unproven, at 09:30 on Sunday 24 April 2011, Dale did opine 
thusly:

> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 06:32 on Sunday 24 April 2011, Dale did
> > opine
> > 
> > thusly:
> >> Well, I synced and got this interesting message:
> >> 
> >> root@fireball / # emerge -uvDNp world
> >> 
> >> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >> 
> >> Calculating dependencies... done!
> >> 
> >> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1".
> >> (dependency required by "kde-base/kjots-4.5.95" [ebuild])
> >> (dependency required by "kde-base/kdepim-meta-4.5.95" [ebuild])
> >> (dependency required by "kde-base/kde-meta-4.6.2[semantic-desktop]"
> >> [installed])
> >> (dependency required by "@selected" [set])
> >> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
> >> root@fireball / #
> >> 
> >> So, it is not masked or keyworded, it just plain ain't there.  Since
> >> this is unstable, should I report it as a bug or wait on the Raid to
> >> show up on it's own?
> > 
> > so is it kjots from the kde overlays that's doing it?
> 
> I don't have any overlays on here that I know of, unless portage did
> something fancy that I'm not aware of.  It appears that something got
> moved into the tree but maybe one ebuild got missed.  That's the reason
> for my post and the question.  Am I correct or is there something fishy
> on my system?  I did wait a few hours and sync again, just in case I got
> it in the middle of the change or something.  This is the correct
> command for listing local overlays correct?

I just synced myself, and it's not an overlay issue.

kdepim-4.5.95 just got moved into the tree (masked) and you likely have one or 
more of those package unmasked. Or a mask is missing in the tree.

Either way, find the list in $PORTDIR/profiles/package.mask and comparing with 
what update world wants to do, you will see what needs to be done next.

kdepim-4.5.95 is not the version you want, latest useable is 4.4.11 (it's out 
of step with version numbers of everything else in kde)



-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-24  9:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-24  4:32 [gentoo-user] no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1" Dale
2011-04-24  7:01 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-04-24  7:30   ` Dale
2011-04-24  9:14     ` Alan McKinnon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox