From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QDjMn-0002Cv-Fr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:23:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B9DE1C025; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C151E1C025 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1360418wyi.40 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:22:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=CtnSXob8qBwQmty+KiEEySwoP/hiMiRWZKVmphHqd3Y=; b=FPJ7JeLUlLxjYT7BErIGzHf9S6jlkCViEhqrfubDyJMZo3ktMwn26zGzg9kne+gYoT jXgYLG4Bap/tHmbX610dUxxTEPix7emOoYaMNiHkei9mrOdLFQORWeay/ml7hBcRB4hh UC/zUnOroWpSHVmHbiDhEtulEOACkDp3k6I2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=IVjW/JYEMtJc8cLHp82qoIPO54sPF5ypLW3HoFxjWvN2zNiPiVFcMsR1HVItDISWPk jjRdTXrJsxhFO6gmHtYiMQA8xjRt63uCrKLdy4bUqXpFAZbiibfVlLXrBUVrVVQT57jQ q+5uDkXUnUDhG/k7UJdMGHKIBAndfAWT7V7FM= Received: by 10.216.91.17 with SMTP id g17mr2113621wef.1.1303590126105; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:22:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-215-19-231.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.215.19.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ed10sm2426072wbb.15.2011.04.23.13.22.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:22:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please! Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 22:21:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-ck; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110422180508.GA17715@acm.acm> <201104230043.45952.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20110423163544.GA18788@acm.acm> In-Reply-To: <20110423163544.GA18788@acm.acm> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201104232221.28990.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e0b1aba4f681cbc49f316d6503eeaa44 Apparently, though unproven, at 18:35 on Saturday 23 April 2011, Alan Mackenzie did opine thusly: > OK. I managed to get the problem fixed, basically by trying everything, > though I don't really understand what I did. This was my recipe: > > emerge --sync > emerge --update --deep --newuse xfce4-meta > > , which updated libglade-2.6.4 and pygtk-2.22.0-r1 successfully. So > thanks! In that case, you either had an incomplete portage tree and syncing gave you all the bits you needed. Or the pygtk ebuild was faulty and the dev fixed it without bumping the version number. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com