public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joost Roeleveld <joost@antarean.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Howzat!
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:41:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110420134214.BA40026C3@data.antarean.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104201516.40996.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>

On Wednesday 20 April 2011 15:16:40 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 14:37 on Wednesday 20 April 2011, Joost
> 
> Roeleveld did opine thusly:
> > On Wednesday 20 April 2011 11:25:27 Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 20 April 2011 03:42:13 Dale wrote:
> > > > Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday 19 April 2011 17:54:02 Dale wrote:
> > > > >> Kfir Lavi wrote:
> > > > >>> I do a lot of compiling on my laptop using Catalyst for
> > > > >>> embedded.
> > > > >>> I upgraded my RAM to 8GB (2x4GB = 90$ ebay).
> > > > >>> I mount /var/tmp as tmpfs.
> > > > >>> Thats how I keep my SSD ;)
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> Kfir
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>>      --
> > > > >>>      Poison [BLX]
> > > > >>>      Joshua M. Murphy
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> I got 16Gbs in my rig and I mounted portages work
> > > > >> directory on
> > > > >> tmpfs,
> > > > >> it
> > > > >> was actually slower.  That is likely a good idea to keep
> > > > >> from
> > > > >> wearing
> > > > >> out the SSD but it doesn't seem to make anything compile
> > > > >> faster.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Strange, it actually got faster on mine when doing that.
> > > > > Did you mount with "noatime"? :)
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > Joost
> > > > 
> > > > Yep.  It actually took a few seconds longer compiling in memory.
> > > >  I
> > > > thought that was weird to tho.  It doesn't make much sense to
> > > > me.
> > > > 
> > > > Dale
> > > > 
> > > > :-)  :-)
> > > 
> > > Hmm...
> > > Will be doing some timing-tests then....
> > > Openoffice is a good one for that ;)
> > 
> > Ok, just done the tests. using tmpfs for /var/tmp/portage is quicker,
> > but
> > not by much.
> > 
> > Without TMPFS:
> > # time emerge -v openoffice
> > real 32m44.742s
> > user 20m18.320s
> > sys 5m38.000s
> > 
> > With TMPFS:
> > # mount -onoatime,size=7G -ttmpfs none /var/tmp/portage
> > # time emerge -v openoffice
> > real 31m30.835s
> > user 20m3.510s
> > sys 5m38.030s
> > 
> > Specification of this machine:
> > 12GB RAM
> > Quad Core Xeon W3565 @ 3.2Ghz with HT enabled
> > 
> > There are 2 drives in stripe-mode (software RAID-0) which does speed up
> > the I/O a lot.
> 
> I'd say the entirety of /var/tmp/portage for your OOo build fits into your
> ram disk cache so very little actual disk IO is happening.
> 
> I also noticed before switching to libreoffice-bin that the ooo build was
> largely cpu-bound anyway (disk light flashed seldom)

Alan,

I would love to do a better test then this.
Reason I took Openoffice is because it's known to be a large build (requires a 
lot of diskspace) and takes a long time.

If you know which other ebuilds might make for a better test, I will be happy 
to redo the test with those.

--
Joost



  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-20 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-18  1:28 [gentoo-user] Howzat! Peter Humphrey
2011-04-18  1:44 ` Dale
2011-04-18  4:53   ` Joshua Murphy
2011-04-18  7:52     ` Florian Philipp
2011-04-18  8:12       ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-18  9:32         ` Florian Philipp
2011-04-19 22:40     ` Kfir Lavi
2011-04-19 22:54       ` Dale
2011-04-20  7:33         ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-04-20  8:42           ` Dale
2011-04-20  9:25             ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-04-20  9:49               ` Pandu Poluan
2011-04-20 10:24                 ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-04-21  5:41                   ` Pandu Poluan
2011-04-21 15:49                     ` Paul Hartman
2011-04-20 12:37               ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-04-20 13:16                 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-04-20 13:41                   ` Joost Roeleveld [this message]
2011-04-20 20:06                     ` Alan McKinnon
2011-04-20 21:38                       ` Mick
2011-04-18 11:22   ` Peter Humphrey
2011-04-18 12:44     ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-18 14:35       ` Peter Humphrey
2011-04-18 14:51         ` Florian Philipp
2011-04-18 15:48           ` Peter Humphrey
2011-04-18 15:59             ` Peter Humphrey
2011-04-18 21:56           ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-19  5:34             ` Thanasis
2011-04-19  6:57               ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-04-19  8:04                 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-19 12:07                   ` Thanasis
2011-04-20 13:33                     ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-20 21:23                       ` Thanasis
2011-04-20 22:01                         ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-21  7:44                           ` Thanasis
2011-04-21  8:03                             ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-21  8:15                               ` Thanasis
2011-04-21 10:57                               ` Thanasis
2011-04-21 13:26                                 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-21 14:45                                   ` Thanasis
2011-04-21 22:09                                     ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-22  5:05                                       ` Thanasis
2011-04-22  7:14                                         ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-22  8:12                                           ` Thanasis
2011-04-22 13:00                                             ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-22 15:26                                               ` Thanasis
2011-04-22 18:46                                                 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-21 13:41                       ` Mark Knecht
2011-04-21 22:42                         ` Neil Bothwick
2011-04-22  0:38                           ` Mark Knecht
2011-04-19 12:40                   ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-04-20 10:40                     ` Thanasis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110420134214.BA40026C3@data.antarean.org \
    --to=joost@antarean.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox