From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QCUbM-0005h3-FA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:25:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B61391C009; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EDB1C009 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.140] (helo=smtp9.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCUZx-0005qI-U7 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:24:13 +0200 Received: from 5ed02730.cm-7-1a.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([94.208.39.48] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp9.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCUZw-0007c6-Ak for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:24:12 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA8830E9 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:25:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from data.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (data.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z-VJxfsKEj1k for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:25:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eve.localnet (eve.lan.antarean.org [10.20.13.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B28671135 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:25:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Joost Roeleveld To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Howzat! Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:24:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/4.6 beta4 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <201104180228.59487.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <20110420092619.48AF730E9@data.antarean.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <20110420102503.0FA8830E9@data.antarean.org> X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1QCUZw-0007c6-Ak X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-0.928, vereist 5, BAYES_00 -1.90, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.98, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.01) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: joost@antarean.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 5b5655fbd40bb83a3bcc6ecf4f49b218 On Wednesday 20 April 2011 16:49:26 Pandu Poluan wrote: > Google Talk: pepoluan > Y! messenger: pepoluan > MSN / Live: pepoluan@hotmail.com (do not send email here) > Skype: pepoluan > More on me: My LinkedIn Account My Facebook Account Wouldn't this fit better at the bottom as a signature? And the links don't work.... > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 16:25, Joost Roeleveld wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 April 2011 03:42:13 Dale wrote: > > > Joost Roeleveld wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 19 April 2011 17:54:02 Dale wrote: > > > >> Kfir Lavi wrote: > > > >>> I do a lot of compiling on my laptop using Catalyst for > > > >>> embedded. > > > >>> I upgraded my RAM to 8GB (2x4GB = 90$ ebay). > > > >>> I mount /var/tmp as tmpfs. > > > >>> Thats how I keep my SSD ;) > > > >>> > > > >>> Kfir > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Poison [BLX] > > > >>> Joshua M. Murphy > > > >> > > > >> I got 16Gbs in my rig and I mounted portages work directory on > > > >> tmpfs, it > > > >> was actually slower. That is likely a good idea to keep from > > > >> wearing out the SSD but it doesn't seem to make anything > > > >> compile faster. > > > > > > > > Strange, it actually got faster on mine when doing that. > > > > Did you mount with "noatime"? :) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Joost > > > > > > Yep. It actually took a few seconds longer compiling in memory. I > > > thought that was weird to tho. It doesn't make much sense to me. > > > > > > Dale > > > > > > :-) :-) > > > > Hmm... > > Will be doing some timing-tests then.... > > Openoffice is a good one for that ;) > > Not LibreOffice? :-) Not switched yet on the test-system and already got the sources downloaded... To test honestly, I need a long build to be able to see a real difference -- Joost