From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QCH71-0003Ry-Q9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:01:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35A311C009; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDD51C009 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AC61803E7 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:59:52 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:59:46 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] I can't understand an emerge error. Help, please! Message-ID: <20110419205946.3fd6a1ba@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4DADA963.8040409@gmail.com> References: <20110418162145.GA4024@acm.acm> <20110418192606.GF6267@ca.inter.net> <20110418230416.166c29fb@digimed.co.uk> <4DACB8A9.9050809@gmail.com> <20110419013608.1918ad20@digimed.co.uk> <4DACDBBF.2080501@gmail.com> <20110419084132.4227cf52@digimed.co.uk> <4DADA963.8040409@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs12 (GTK+ 2.24.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/lb28035CFY_X4Gkm75OjwVM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 446c9903d29e793039f943fd77e7586b --Sig_/lb28035CFY_X4Gkm75OjwVM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:25:23 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> I agree that setting about anything on the command line is a bad > >> idea. However, it is just to test it to see what, if anything, it > >> changes.=20 > > But it doesn't tell you if setting the flag solves the problem, > > because it doesn't attempt to emerge the package that failed. As a > > test it fails. > Then I guess your mileage may vary then. Oh no. Emerging one package to see how another package emerges will give exactly the same result every time, not an inch of variation :( --=20 Neil Bothwick He who laughs last thinks slowest! --Sig_/lb28035CFY_X4Gkm75OjwVM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2t6bcACgkQum4al0N1GQMZoACglls4zPElEVfsyzcpcMgqoYsN 9XoAnRl3/VlLtMfHk7RAQ7Dbk8hAGNIu =8a/o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/lb28035CFY_X4Gkm75OjwVM--