public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: configure wlan0 route metric
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:56:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201104131956.45551.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110413170730.GA3549@gaurahari>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1860 bytes --]

On Wednesday 13 April 2011 18:07:30 Indi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 06:10:05PM +0200, Mick wrote:
> > On 13 April 2011 16:35, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:50:02PM +0200, deadeyes wrote:
> > >> I was searching around the gentoo forums for ifmetric and found this
> > >> piece of code that can be added in /etc/conf.d/net:
> > >> postup() {
> > >>    local metric=0
> > >> 
> > >>    case "${IFACE}" in
> > >>       eth0) metric=0 ;;
> > >>       eth1) metric=1 ;;
> > >>    esac
> > >>    ifmetric "${IFACE}" "${metric}"
> > >> 
> > >>    return 0
> > >> }
> > > 
> > > Hey, that works very well here -- thanks!
> > > Been wanting that solution for some time now.
> > > 
> > > :)
> > 
> > My apologies!  It took some time between reading your message and
> > replying to it - by which time I had forgotten the finer points.
> > 
> > Whether you set NIC priority in the /etc/conf.d/net file or in a post
> > up script, the result is the same.  One NIC will have a higher
> > priority than another for ALL connections.  This is because NICs do
> > not do NATing.  They will send all packets out to the gateway
> > (192.168.1.1) and the router at the gateway will determine which
> > packet is forwarded to the Internet and which to the LAN.  So, if you
> > do not want to prioritise one NIC over another, it may be better to
> > use iptables to route LAN packets via a particular NIC instead.
> 
> Actually I do want to prioritise one over the other, when both are
> connected. Using netplug with one wired and one wireless, and the
> referenced script in /etc/conf.d/net.
> 
> Am I doing it wrong? :)

No, not at all.  It's only that the OP wanted to prioritise the wired 
interface against the wireless, but *only* for connections to the LAN.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-13 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <gHakF-8vF-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <gHakF-8vF-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <gHakG-8vF-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <gHakG-8vF-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <gHakG-8vF-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <gHakF-8vF-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <gHaNL-12f-85@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-04-13 17:07             ` [gentoo-user] Re: configure wlan0 route metric Indi
2011-04-13 18:56               ` Mick [this message]
     [not found]         ` <gHDd0-5d8-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <gHDd0-5d8-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]             ` <gHDd0-5d8-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-04-15  2:06               ` Indi
2011-04-15  5:08                 ` Mick
     [not found] <gHbTt-2Ui-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <gHbTt-2Ui-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <gHbTt-2Ui-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <gHdBT-5Tb-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-04-13 19:27       ` Indi
     [not found] <gGTjR-4Xq-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <gH4Ii-7li-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <gH5kZ-8uC-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <gH6qK-1Rf-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <gH6K6-2j1-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-04-13 15:35         ` Indi
2011-04-13 16:03           ` Mick
2011-04-13 19:52             ` deadeyes
2011-04-14  9:50               ` Mick
     [not found]         ` <gHpWp-7Ds-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <gHrvc-1HW-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-04-14 22:25             ` Indi
2011-04-12 21:14 [gentoo-user] " deadeyes
2011-04-13  9:33 ` Kfir Lavi
2011-04-13 10:06   ` [gentoo-user] " deadeyes
2011-04-13 11:20     ` Mick
2011-04-13 11:40       ` deadeyes
2011-04-14  8:13         ` deadeyes
2011-04-14  9:53           ` Mick
2011-04-14 20:22             ` deadeyes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201104131956.45551.michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
    --to=michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox