From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-121606-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Q9tH4-00042B-K9
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:09:58 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8D4B1C02C;
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:08:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FBA1C02C
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:08:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so280289wwj.10
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent
:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=65PV07t4FK+btISJbcudT6bJf8JKpf/AQIByz6a+6r4=;
b=vFAZXRQuT89Tdqt6GmeE3VkYHfCQxg5AD3Hky1f6o54xbQDDg5UcqvgJpgMXsFbY3D
oC5p6zAoC8oVOnRHTOWZCV/XJC0EWufdDSxEKRyJG/5xtHWPwAhBO74iZqq6P0cXYc++
YN0WorrvKeTsItVenQv9uwKoedMiVJVchfcb0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
b=bZEggU9YSJI6Tvgx0CywcLD1zVTleJnVSCI1jUK7+m71w4HUo8Yf55073WE/Dfx2RY
DpBnBYAGYWv88SWVjevzZmUmvVUC76iPc7K6Qo9mKtxlcBoQTF+gXSSD46oVjlEulRRF
c1S/EYl5zoGr73Bmfq++CF6L8HVnA7dku1rNw=
Received: by 10.216.230.153 with SMTP id j25mr4944170weq.22.1302674900794;
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e13sm109184wbi.40.2011.04.12.23.08.18
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can a forced volume check be interrupted?
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:08:37 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r8; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <BANLkTimput4n9nx3w2tE5hd4x3CC5UchcA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=n6KHRurERV9PVNvStS72KtgRuBw@mail.gmail.com> <1302655543.3973.12.camel@troll>
In-Reply-To: <1302655543.3973.12.camel@troll>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1647235.kpyZU3vGhH";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201104130708.47315.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: fe049d6096453360d3a2b68f9971033f
--nextPart1647235.kpyZU3vGhH
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wednesday 13 April 2011 01:45:43 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:52 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sometimes the ext3 forced volume check at boot triggers at an
> > > inopportune time. Is there a way to skip it and let it run at the
> > > next boot?
> >=20
> > Not once it has started, but there are some ways to avoid it running
> > in the first place:
> >=20
> > Add "fastboot" to your kernel commandline to make it bypass the
> > auto-fsck. A grub entry for "skip fsck" might be handy.
> >=20
> > Edit /etc/fstab to prevent the auto-fsck from ever running by changing
> > the last field to 0.
> >=20
> > If it's an ext[123] you can use tune2fs -i 0 to set the auto-check
> > interval to never.
>=20
> Thats one reason I have been looking at btrfs - online fsck. Has been
> solid even on unexpected crashes (I am setting up remote power on/off
> and pressed the wrong button - more than once :) I actually had some
> minor corruption on reiserfs, but btrfs was fine and could be checked
> online anyway in a lot less time than reiserfsck took.
ext4 takes only a second if not less at boot time - depending on the size o=
f=20
the partition of course.
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick
--nextPart1647235.kpyZU3vGhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk2lPe8ACgkQVTDTR3kpaLbeSgCglg9Isi7sVpo5GqOsGeo5NTMu
bPgAnivuKHfGN5UVnrYcsNXWnOO0G9uG
=NANl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1647235.kpyZU3vGhH--