From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7VA8-0003A7-OR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:00:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0ADD6E06EC; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4B6E06EC for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89AAA8026A for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:59:28 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:59:22 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] http-replicator permissions Message-ID: <20110406165922.674e7d81@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201104061238.21304.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> References: <201104041622.54903.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <4D9B5ECE.1050803@gmail.com> <20110405223856.2ae60efb@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <201104061238.21304.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8cvs72 (GTK+ 2.24.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Q3aN1.Ksrf85fu9yOCp84b3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 945249a0da6f62fcea28b6ca3b57d3eb --Sig_/Q3aN1.Ksrf85fu9yOCp84b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:38:21 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > I cheated and just shared /usrportage, distfiles and all. I wasn't > > > to clear on what I was doing in my reply up there. =20 > >=20 > > Even $PKGDIR? That's not a good idea unless you have identical > > hardware and USE flags. =20 >=20 > But didn't you say the other day that you do nfs-mount the target's > $PKGDIR on the host? Yes, but a separate PGKDIR for each host. I don't just export $PORTDIR and leave PKGDIR in there. --=20 Neil Bothwick without C people would code in Basi, Pasal and Obol --Sig_/Q3aN1.Ksrf85fu9yOCp84b3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2cjd8ACgkQum4al0N1GQPXzgCg0MhLA/3vZYQaxWCKjcnkMRwp JigAn2N4CQVP9P/7RT449P+WefGFMlnv =eApF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Q3aN1.Ksrf85fu9yOCp84b3--