From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q62eD-0006yc-7S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 15:21:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04542E04BA; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 15:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD42CE04BA for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 15:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AE6DEC9A for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 16:19:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PDrPMQA8vix5 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 16:19:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.localnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A33DEC1E for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 16:19:45 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] distcc and crossdev, anyone? Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 16:19:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r8; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201012172256.29857.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <20101218101843.4885d016@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101218101843.4885d016@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201104021619.45277.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 049543a6b1a8ee7154b8aef97d477ef1 On Saturday 18 December 2010 10:18:43 Neil Bothwick wrote: > I've found there's just too much overhead with distcc, plus much of the > work is still done locally. I have a couple of Atom boxes, a server and a > netbook, and I've set up a chroot for each on my workstation. In the > chroot I have FEATURES=buildpkg, using an NFS mounted PKGDIR available to > both computers, then I emerge -k on the Atom box. Just to confirm, and to save me having to think more deeply than I'm able pro tem, does each chroot have identical make.conf and package.use to those on its target? And do you nfs-mount only the PKGDIR, or the whole of /usr/portage/ ? -- Rgds Peter