On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:50:57 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:

> > I've also been hit by the first, as I think I mentioned. As for the
> > other two, re-emerging a binary package won't help at all, because
> > it's a binary package, so you unpack it rather than rebuild it.
> > That's more a problem with using binary packages on a source distro
> > than a fault of python-updater itself.  
> 
> Understood and agreed. For OO I couldn't quite get up the interest to
> start building from scratch though. Something like 450MB of things to
> download and then what, do it again in a week or two? Not worth it for
> my needs.

That shouldn't be a problem with the release frequency of OOo, with LO
that's more of a problem.

At least with OOo/LO you get a better program for the effort of
compiling, the open source version of VirtualBox is crippled :(


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.