From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3aos-00037K-K8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:14:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B3E51C080; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E8D1C080 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so2374241wwj.10 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:12:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=EIciy+51LOqrH7KSD4jPOMrxf66BhkyOlTaxrUnd/ko=; b=o914yX29YLtGLU0zq0C40pgS6xJ0KS2p370XyylBA9mdgGxjoBhzylYkoxV6jp1HTa clPP0LofispwaOWNPJjai1j/6wGPSgSQ4xosi/M95cFUmv9bV6p348gA9TGer+aaNwp5 Uaa4TYVvxLwhzCqVvQe+gK5tUcSzZgWnw0Oug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=kMKJy1wlT67X0pfvTHcnJrvFkHNK4sBtaPzx+rd6+cT3Yoqfcq1Mze2aO5lGbz59Ic 2Uq/7OuA+AU4GvcGR4WZj2qKX7L8Z2zBNooaVnYaB9xLZJN7E75kjqVVwCqLoLLsnf8I Ko7pyT4dYE4eOtCQteldFBbBs+o0HUlCQaYTU= Received: by 10.216.240.71 with SMTP id d49mr1157130wer.0.1301173928148; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t11sm862700wes.17.2011.03.26.14.12.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.7 && python-updater Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:12:08 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart10024095.o7uUVYRi9P"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201103262112.28206.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f370ad82b9d3ec3c405fafa3bf3fe251 --nextPart10024095.o7uUVYRi9P Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 26 March 2011 20:53:50 Mark Knecht wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Bill Longman =20 wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Mark Knecht =20 wrote: > >=20 > >> I had nothing linked to libmpfr.so.1 so that wasn't the root cause/ > >>=20 > >> In my case it seems to be driven by bugs like this: > >>=20 > >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D360425 > >>=20 > >> Seems the only thing to do it just wait for devs to fix it. (And > >> wonder why something like python-2.7 gets released as stable with > >> stuff like this hanging about....) > >>=20 > >> Cheers, > >> Mark > >=20 > > The libmpfr change bit me on one of my amd64 machines. I did the > > revdep-rebuild on the library and then gcc was broken. I recompiled > > everything but still sandbox and gcc won't compile. > > -- > > Bill Longman >=20 > Bill, > I got bit by the sandbox/gcc problem yesterday. In my case, on a > machine with a KDE profile && after reviewing Gentoo bug reports, I > did the following: >=20 > eselect profile set 1 > cd /lib > ln -s ../lib32/ld-linux.so.2 . > emerge sandbox > emerge --sync > emerge glibc > emerge @preserved-rebuild > eselect profile set 4 > emerge -e -j9 @system >=20 > and an hour later I was back to functional without those messages > about not being able to build C programs, etc. >=20 > I don't suggest ANY of that is understood by the likes of me but it > did seem to solve the problem which was (apparently) wrapped around > some sort of missing link which allows 64-bit machines to run 32-bit > programs. (Or that's about all I could get out of what I read....) >=20 > Hope this helps, and hoping someone more knowledgable than I chimes in > with what I should have/could have done to do this more easily. >=20 > Cheers, > Mark I had a problem with it too (gcc would not compile) but that was because I = was=20 trying to emerge everything at the same time. I slowed down, finished with= =20 the libmpfr revdep-rebuild and then run python updater, switched to python-= 2.7=20 and run revdep-rebuild again. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart10024095.o7uUVYRi9P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk2OVrwACgkQVTDTR3kpaLZtrgCgqqQtuc11yi4fGfc7fd/ihc1N /yIAoPe35Srxr+xXTNGOupkdqW7ZGkwv =k5SV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart10024095.o7uUVYRi9P--