From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PtNZz-0000rk-6p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:05:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B6361C13A for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9D41C02E for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so399571wwb.10 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:28:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=3/ZRbtYoD244BMYH0ztq3EaqzbKXuRZ+7FC2+aizURE=; b=xfmsz4Ly8/Gy07oHikEDvd6s2d7GvESom0cb/0DaZ0N43CdyjyreRjKtY+9b+DxQN4 hTahoHuZsPwD97PxggHD/O+43+MNwDPMgyEefYCyTDrzY0j1/8YZ2nO3r6USA5Nzr85t jHOR+n20323A40mPRaeyQR8syfdB+T/7G3gQ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=PktS4n5uNIKYxUtiwkIm8Chj6LxdZnlKBZAS5LEsWChJ59lHH/IRaf4r0I8xzvlCGh DJOqW/zOfYddd1um2WddaXDdueiwo0mXP8L/le3ZEz5NywwC161BWWwQbx+AmFepijhS sS6pyRKtAaG2sIGozfhG6VMLODVJQB4eH0HOM= Received: by 10.227.127.197 with SMTP id h5mr3338920wbs.1.1298737736338; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:28:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w25sm1621991wbd.23.2011.02.26.08.28.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:28:54 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Ebuild hacking howto Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:28:35 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201102260828.05801.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4D6914A3.9010005@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D6914A3.9010005@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4273266.CjTuUPdvyz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102261628.53745.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8d47e63036c8d0de2bfc2967309ea6cc --nextPart4273266.CjTuUPdvyz Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 26 February 2011 14:56:35 Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > Not related to the OP's question, but couldn't stop myself from asking: > >=20 > > Why is/was webmin dropped from portage? > >=20 > > I saw bug 348432 for webmin-1.530, but other than offering an ebuild it > > didn't say. >=20 > From gentoo-dev: >=20 > # Diego E. Petten=F2 (10 Aug 2010) > # on behalf of QA team > # > # Breaks about any QA policy regarding not touching > # live filesystem as it writes to LVM configuration, > # cron configuration, current-running kernel modules, RPM > # library, ... > # > # Removal on 2010-10-09 > app-admin/webmin >=20 > That help? Yes, thank you. :) =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart4273266.CjTuUPdvyz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk1pKkUACgkQVTDTR3kpaLbcNQCgmelRjWfx3Riuou1HkUb9mvLI 6/QAn3wXefstL3MFGY/tCZByy+LyTNsA =WnDF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4273266.CjTuUPdvyz--