From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why is KDE part of the system set?
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:12:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110224161218.27a679a0@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D667792.6040805@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 689 bytes --]
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:21:54 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I was always under the impression that @system was supposed to be a
> limited set of packages to build, including dependencies. For me, if I
> have a issue, I usually start with emerge -e system to see if it
> helps. Since there is some KDE stuff in there, that makes it build
> packages that I most likely don't need to be rebuilt. To me, KDE is
> not a system package.
Actually, it is, because you told it to be. To me, KDE is not a system
package, because I run different USE flags to you. Gentoo gave you the
gun but you pointed it at your foot :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 11: Terribly pleased
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-24 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 4:28 [gentoo-user] Why is KDE part of the system set? Dale
2011-02-23 9:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-23 11:47 ` Dale
2011-02-23 12:25 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-23 15:57 ` Dale
2011-02-23 22:52 ` Mike Edenfield
2011-02-24 0:16 ` Dale
2011-02-24 0:48 ` Alex Schuster
2011-02-24 11:40 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-02-24 12:19 ` Dale
2011-02-24 2:08 ` Walter Dnes
2011-02-24 12:32 ` Dale
2011-02-24 12:47 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-02-24 13:03 ` Dale
2011-02-24 13:23 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-02-24 14:08 ` Dale
2011-02-24 14:55 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-24 15:21 ` Dale
2011-02-24 16:12 ` Neil Bothwick [this message]
2011-02-24 17:34 ` Dale
2011-02-24 19:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-25 1:08 ` Walter Dnes
2011-02-26 4:10 ` Dale
2011-02-26 13:54 ` Mark Knecht
2011-02-26 14:43 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-26 15:24 ` Dale
2011-02-26 15:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-26 21:59 ` Mike Gilbert
2011-02-24 17:32 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-02-24 17:41 ` Mark Knecht
2011-02-24 17:52 ` Mark Knecht
2011-02-23 12:57 ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-02-23 14:31 ` Mark Knecht
[not found] <gpf97-vC-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpjmq-7Ig-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gplxU-2ZI-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpm0V-3W6-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpprR-1yy-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpyY9-15c-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpIEa-Q1-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpINP-141-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpJ7d-1M3-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-02-24 13:32 ` Elaine C. Sharpe
2011-02-24 14:18 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110224161218.27a679a0@zaphod.digimed.co.uk \
--to=neil@digimed.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox