From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PoDKY-0004vu-CY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:07:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 039D3E084F for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081B6E0776 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C81DECA8 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:31:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05DUX8gfbo7I for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:31:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wstn.localnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A643DEC8E for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:31:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [gentoo-user] Avoiding HAL Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:31:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201102111621.46555.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <20110211173944.1fcc1e04@dartworks.biz> In-Reply-To: <20110211173944.1fcc1e04@dartworks.biz> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102121031.06804.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 769ad23a150800ed92400d9f2fb0caed On Saturday 12 February 2011 01:39:44 Keith Dart wrote: > Start by resetting to all defaults.. ;-) That was the obvious first step. > Many motherboards these days support "unsafe" settings (overclocking, > etc.) Yes, this one does, but I've never used them. > if you haven't already. I have, as you see.