From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simultaneously emerging multiple packages with same dependencies
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:36:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110127153637.0ea4101a@digimed.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ihs1qu$pl6$1@dough.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 776 bytes --]
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > So on a 20 package world update, only 19 are faster while the 20th
> > runs at the same speed? Where's the loss there? Even if the last were
> > slower, it would be worth it.
>
> Given the amount of time unpack/configure/install of most packages
> needs (very short), my observation is that it would not be worth it.
Even if that were true, how much time would you have to save to justify
adding -j 2 to EMERGE_DEFAULTS in make.conf?
But it's not true, large packages spend a lot of time on these phases of
the install.
--
Neil Bothwick
Head: (n.) the part of a disk drive which detects sectors and decides
which of the two possible values to return: 'lose a turn' or 'bankrupt.'
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 12:12 [gentoo-user] Simultaneously emerging multiple packages with same dependencies PK
2011-01-26 13:07 ` Petri Rosenström
2011-01-26 13:49 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-01-26 18:28 ` PK
2011-01-26 19:43 ` Jacob Todd
2011-01-27 5:12 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-01-27 10:01 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-01-27 13:11 ` Dale
2011-01-27 13:33 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-01-27 14:05 ` YoYo Siska
2011-01-27 14:12 ` J. Roeleveld
2011-01-27 18:13 ` YoYo Siska
2011-01-27 19:41 ` Dale
2011-01-27 20:15 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-01-27 20:25 ` Paul Hartman
2011-01-27 21:46 ` J. Roeleveld
2011-01-27 22:05 ` Paul Hartman
2011-01-27 22:18 ` J. Roeleveld
2011-01-27 22:59 ` Mick
2011-01-28 7:16 ` J. Roeleveld
2011-01-27 21:11 ` Bill Longman
2011-01-27 22:53 ` Dale
2011-01-28 7:16 ` J. Roeleveld
2011-01-28 14:53 ` Dale
2011-01-27 14:16 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-01-27 14:30 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-01-27 14:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-01-27 15:09 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-01-27 15:15 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-01-27 15:43 ` Dale
2011-01-27 15:36 ` Neil Bothwick [this message]
2011-01-27 18:56 ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-01-27 19:18 ` J. Roeleveld
2011-01-27 21:06 ` YoYo Siska
2011-01-27 22:02 ` J. Roeleveld
2011-01-27 22:14 ` J. Roeleveld
2011-02-04 22:06 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-27 15:14 ` Paul Hartman
2011-02-04 21:14 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-27 15:33 ` PK
[not found] <gfdih-76I-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gfsr0-7M6-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gfwXE-72T-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-01-27 16:04 ` David W Noon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110127153637.0ea4101a@digimed.co.uk \
--to=neil@digimed.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox