From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PXinj-0005Co-IP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:17:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B70FE071C; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CE6E071C for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf22 with SMTP id 22so11863551wyf.40 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:16:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=Q0J/wLpYoW+GcTc/zYMFFeiOgfAvtkKP8NMMeb8WAxQ=; b=OksfKifSraoDYb6mKUXHBwVNHfjUyqG13rs0uSJ9Oxz0xT490DU56DPQa5b/It6on9 RLrCp7eYKRKsdBIEtJLbcMG5XjGKNJamqzUoqm0MX6SwMWXOQan2NREPYpBUq0B4RQ47 2QkyGBr3tLnH7JXOSYOzdbrNKLQF3UxIFeXMs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Gxpp1NsgIZGAbe917TG+2lanvhAoy6o8mi75/HWS8Fqlm+G/g5oZ4GCWW+nOMJ9NZT DfRVws4JC/SAEv6MdXFnPKJ0FXC+Ih+8Fjy6C186VXG0wndf6nYCv6XAaYfcNVJJQeeE cjvjO7s+YWfNE4r59dq4t0kt2yhWS7OUF00Jg= Received: by 10.216.172.206 with SMTP id t56mr12111755wel.66.1293578184431; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:16:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f52sm6781365wes.11.2010.12.28.15.16.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:16:23 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Best way to copy /* ? Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:16:17 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4d1a0fa8.TVuQcBiVBzUKO5TQ%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20101228223353.3dc949d8@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101228223353.3dc949d8@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart16814212.GZijc8tzdN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012282316.28863.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 036402e1-9281-4231-b081-da54dca3f393 X-Archives-Hash: b4634dbb78f6945d698122c4496bd0f4 --nextPart16814212.GZijc8tzdN Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 28 December 2010 22:33:53 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:26:16 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > Which can be done with the -l option. > >=20 > > You are mistaken: The -l option causes tar to warn if not all hars > > links to a file could not be resolved. >=20 > You are right. I was referring to the --one-file-system, which I thought > had -l as the short option, but apparently not. Or has that changed in > the last couple of years? Yes, there used to be a warning on the man page saying that --one-file-syst= em=20 should be be used instead of -l. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart16814212.GZijc8tzdN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk0ab8wACgkQVTDTR3kpaLbjMACgu6tjGiRkoLJSMVInlGhcQDu6 q2wAoOETmuyyur74xHNIyumTnaSy1uPS =jbl7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart16814212.GZijc8tzdN--