From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PTyVn-0003fd-D3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:15:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94679E0698; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A143E0698 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927A3DEBE2 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:14:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJi60EeabSN8 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:14:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from humphrey.ukfsn.org (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CD0DEBDD for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:14:34 +0000 (GMT) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] distcc and crossdev, anyone? Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:15:03 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.5.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <201012172256.29857.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <20101218101843.4885d016@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101218101843.4885d016@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012181515.03108.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 20e558d9-062e-4555-91a7-dc428eb37599 X-Archives-Hash: 92f4f720c94d0e1cf31265efe9ebc436 On Saturday 18 December 2010 10:18:43 Neil Bothwick wrote: > I've found there's just too much overhead with distcc, plus much of > the work is still done locally. I expected that but I wanted to try it to see. > I have a couple of Atom boxes, a server and a netbook, and I've set up > a chroot for each on my workstation. In the chroot I have > FEATURES=buildpkg, using an NFS mounted PKGDIR available to both > computers, then I emerge -k on the Atom box. Maybe I'll go this way instead. Thanks for the idea, which is similar to one from YoYo Siska three days ago. -- Rgds Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.