From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PJ2Z4-00072G-8i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:22:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E533FE0795; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C98E0795 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C617276DADC for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:21:39 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:21:33 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] One machine sends "emerge" text output to stderr, not stdout Message-ID: <20101118112133.45a5c999@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101118002025.GA23732@waltdnes.org> References: <20101117002517.GA18328@waltdnes.org> <20101118002025.GA23732@waltdnes.org> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6cvs63 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/NQT8acKtetUQZShDTktWplD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: cb84e57e-ee97-46b4-8ca3-62d2d8f737cd X-Archives-Hash: bf8ab3cec43058c950c5aaaa774c8092 --Sig_/NQT8acKtetUQZShDTktWplD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:20:25 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: > Because I don't want a repeat of the ipv6 fiasco where I had an almost > non-functional browser, mediaplayer (for internet files), etc, etc. Hardly non-functional - desperately slow maybe but far from non-functional. Blaming the devs for your broken modem/router is rather unfair. If you'd known it was unable to handle IPv6 correctly, why didn't you set the flag accordingly? If you didn't know, HTH were the devs supposed to know? Bear in mind the current thread discussing Gentoo following upstream closely and setting suitable defaults. Upstream include IPv6 support, Gentoo provides an option to turn this off, you missed it. That's a very poor performance for a control freak (speaking from a personal perspective). --=20 Neil Bothwick A man wrapped up in himself makes a very small package. --Sig_/NQT8acKtetUQZShDTktWplD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzlDEIACgkQum4al0N1GQObTQCgkfizdjxGC1mO1kXZzNUl2d8l w9QAn2cCGAs4oguK3ctf1N5KS1Y/QuAt =fL1J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/NQT8acKtetUQZShDTktWplD--