From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-116533-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1PGchg-0008CY-FR
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:21:00 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BE20E07C6;
	Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:20:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C63E07C6
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:20:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eyb6 with SMTP id 6so1522655eyb.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date
         :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        bh=kPFsVbPuYwPLUF2BHu3jfzPLirOJOsYTeAbRuYXxmvc=;
        b=eOdgCxZlAX16Qr45w4/QwbKA2ycbSNK3W1Reh+rxAZ/JVsp7O0bsq+y6BZQIZDb6QA
         DKPQaBIbIJLqNrtagnZZi8oNDY+Mz4Os9CJYfFC50zJwv6yN750F4tI3GZjt/TgDsD6G
         DuPBJGZ7kL/DaOoCTnJsY/Y3uhMTMZPgwGo6k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        b=qh5XpwbEtJMgZn2kNE3QfzQ45ovsPUXl824DNW4A6X9xGqfLwtrUuKXXncJjamaI5x
         lxiLNB0q6Z9TghpMiwBMed0PN6J68RMchjXKXcGD5PEcNh57jz2UPPPFXy8pi/ag2w+n
         6/qxblXOTPeLUzFMz8kXjT3Tb4MKQlm8/Afdk=
Received: by 10.213.22.66 with SMTP id m2mr1257104ebb.56.1289503237110;
        Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-215-2-42.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.215.2.42])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v51sm2263817eeh.22.2010.11.11.11.20.35
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Upgrading from FX-5200 to a GeForce 6200 512MB
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:21:11 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-ck; KDE/4.5.3; x86_64; ; )
References: <4CBD4C85.2010500@gmail.com> <4CDC15A6.8010104@gmail.com> <4CDC1E87.5010203@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CDC1E87.5010203@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201011112121.11959.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 63722a02-fe76-4c95-bb76-98ab249f7971
X-Archives-Hash: 40174b2d88332c605c3799bd793fe172

Apparently, though unproven, at 18:49 on Thursday 11 November 2010, Dale did 
opine thusly:

> Dale wrote:
> > I did a test just then and my video was slow again.  This is what I
> > get now.
> > 
> > root@smoker / # glxgears
> > Running synchronized to the vertical refresh.  The framerate should be
> > approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
> > 677 frames in 5.6 seconds = 120.183 FPS
> > 1 frames in 7.6 seconds =  0.132 FPS
> > 1 frames in 7.6 seconds =  0.132 FPS
> > 1 frames in 8.2 seconds =  0.122 FPS
> > 1 frames in 7.6 seconds =  0.131 FPS
> > 1 frames in 7.6 seconds =  0.132 FPS
> > XIO:  fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server
> > ":0.0"
> > 
> >       after 46 requests (46 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
> > 
> > root@smoker / #
> > 
> > 
> > So, looks like emerge -e world didn't help after all.  So what should
> > I check now?  Do I need to get my hammer out?
> > 
> > Dale
> > 
> > :-)  :-)
> 
> False alarm.  I looked at top and noticed that that stupid hp-systray
> was using about 90% of my CPU.  I killed that thing and now it plays
> fine again.
> 
> I do wish they would fix that thing.  For some reason hp-systray does
> that from time to time.  It is usually after dbus has a hiccup.  Logging
> out of KDE and back in again usually fixes it tho.
> 
> Anyway, back to normal.  Well, normal for me anyway.  ;-)

Whatever hp-systray is, I'd dump it.

When a single app or feature kills the entire machine and it's ability to draw 
on the screen, it's time to find a way to do without the app.


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com