From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PE3C2-0003vs-Mi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:01:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D4BBE09AF; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC0FE09AF for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so1226782ewy.40 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:01:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=h5OzK0nD8cBHiupweZjCN6jW/97BP318LEYkN36hEbg=; b=EgQwB/n/WK8SfqhW+YYPUk98sftogKpMhH6zzY/EP9byK8FgriY8tUW17w97WrVgtE ovEGNslFN5XzVXAeWGO+kqGdD8O4kODDP9RokGRCszdqPvnjkeW5jMrRyP6CJyHvNeWS lzAYXOkk4C6vUK7M7Wn85iJTUgb3xFRxSgojs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=f/MeIRMKCP8AeHNe2skI6KffOZwXhrBWMsxH03tG7fo85ISgRTh0yIWihwRd3OQKIk guXzNw99VSxG+0P2s/6nXIns21xDfxYTujR9aOe8aKfv3MbwjqgqEOoOGkmySj73yKeT +RSKBeDv/oIdNV6sUt9PIj9oOWGS6iVrEq3kU= Received: by 10.213.13.130 with SMTP id c2mr861592eba.35.1288890074413; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-215-2-42.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.215.2.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm126347eeh.11.2010.11.04.10.01.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:01:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: world symlinking Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:01:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-ck; KDE/4.5.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4CCF519A.6060500@garygolden.me> <20101104093011.402a3aeb@digimed.co.uk> <201011041646.33661.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> In-Reply-To: <201011041646.33661.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011041901.45996.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 07773b5b-52c5-43c1-bc8e-b57de8ea926a X-Archives-Hash: 23c0f041910f660ff43dbdb0c49b48e1 Apparently, though unproven, at 18:46 on Thursday 04 November 2010, Peter Humphrey did opine thusly: > On Thursday 04 November 2010 09:30:11 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > They just changed from package masking to keyword masking, as noted > > in the ChangeLog > > I couldn't get emerge to show me the change log. > > > Remove the entry from /etc/portage/package.unmask and add it > > to /etc/portage/package.keywords. This applies equally to ~x86 and > > ~amd64. > > As expected, that didn't help - this is a ~amd64 gentoo box, and so > everything is already emerged with the ~amd64 keyword. I still get a > missing-keyword error from emerge. It's not package.keywords, it's package.accept_keywords. The old name will be accepted for a while but I don't know when that warranty expires. Do this: