From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PDnld-0006Ng-CG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:33:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 969B0E068C; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705DEE068C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D67DDEC43 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:32:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dU1DJQL3r589 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:32:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from humphrey.ukfsn.org (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD7FDEC41 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:32:02 +0000 (GMT) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: world symlinking Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:32:01 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo; KDE/4.5.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <4CCF519A.6060500@garygolden.me> <201011032053.01243.francesco.talamona@know.eu> <4CD1EBCD.2070407@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD1EBCD.2070407@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011040032.01207.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: c8a31dfa-19e0-42bd-93d1-f23891aab554 X-Archives-Hash: 32cee05ea4d1770764df8b9924eb6cb0 On Wednesday 03 November 2010 23:10:05 Dale wrote: > I synced this morning and I still got it. > > [IP-] [ ] sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc67 On this ~amd64 box portage 2.2x was hard-masked a day or two ago and I was required to downgrade to sys-apps/portage-2.1.9.24. It seems that the 2.2 branch is now only fit for 32-bit systems - there must really be some hard problem in there. -- Rgds Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.