From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PBVfL-0002AG-HS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AD53E079A; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.shawcable.com (shawmail.shawcable.com [64.59.128.220]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBB4E079A for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bpd2mi4no-svcs.prod.shawcable.com ([10.0.184.123]) by bpd2mo2no-ssvc.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2010 10:49:20 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=W1EbViUdRLrB3xZls61b9cpNy9JNgdRUyrcMJe3sx/g= c=1 sm=1 a=dLVxVA3L5FEA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=dgx804EzjhD8CRYpIFkhZA==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=7mOBRU54AAAA:8 a=BJ3Yq8bIKUwRfeTnEdIA:9 a=GFq98-ZcbZOSxAIrIdwA:7 a=C76R2aSJn6-VX9b8Fl8Te0esKaIA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,253,1286172000"; d="scan'208";a="276184796" Received: from unknown (HELO bpd2mi4no-cmts.prod.shawcable.com) ([192.168.183.123]) by bpd2mi4no-cmts.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2010 10:49:20 -0600 X-reinject: true Received: from unknown (HELO syscon4.localdomain) ([68.148.245.78]) by bpd2mi4no-dmz.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2010 10:49:20 -0600 Received: by syscon4.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A922AC3A7F; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:48:37 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:48:37 -0600 From: Joseph To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] perl 5.12 downgrade ?? Message-ID: <20101028164837.GA17225@syscon4.inet> References: <20101028125822.GY17225@syscon4.inet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 36c49a86-2bce-4d81-a93d-25e5b4a63ca8 X-Archives-Hash: 806c5c99ce2eb0a1b9d16c02f3899ef9 On 10/28/10 15:05, Mick wrote: >On 28 October 2010 13:58, Joseph wrote: >> After upgrading to Perl 5.12 and all cleanup "perl-cleaner --all" >> When I run "emerge --depclean" it asked me to removed the following packages >> listed below. >> However, when I check all of them are needed by some other packages. Do I >> need them? (I retained them all) >> >> virtual/perl-Package-Constants >> virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib >> virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 >> dev-java/antlr perl-core/MIME-Base64 >> perl-core/Test-Simple >> perl-core/Archive-Tar >> perl-core/Test-Harness >> perl-core/IO-Compress >> perl-core/IO-Zlib >> perl-core/Digest-MD5 >> perl-core/CGI >> perl-core/Digest-SHA perl-core/Compress-Raw-Bzip2 perl-core/Sys-Syslog >> perl-core/digest-base perl-core/Compress-Raw-Zlib >> perl-core/version >> perl-core/DB_File >> perl-core/Package-Constants >> dev-java/gjdoc >> perl-core/libnet >> >> The reason I'm asking is that I'm getting some strange errors when using >> 'sql-ledger' eg. >> Using a hash as a reference is deprecated at SL/IS.pm line 582. >> >> I think it might be related to recent perl upgrade. >> Is it possible / safe to downgrade to previous "perl-5.8.8-r8" ? >> or do I just delete the above perl module. > >I am getting the same here. I retained everything until things settle >a bit and newer versions get unmasked. > >-- >Regards, >Mick I think all these packages can be remove now, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343093 -- Joseph