From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PBFgY-0006O8-FA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:45:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAC0FE09EC; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7135FE09EC for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zaphod.digimed.co.uk (zaphod.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 969AB621AA6 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:44:59 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:44:54 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] swap usage creeping up Message-ID: <20101028004454.2d6cc500@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1288219650.8318.168.camel@localhost> References: <1288072147.8318.56.camel@localhost> <1288076539.8318.116.camel@localhost> <1288219650.8318.168.camel@localhost> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6cvs59 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/3JP+AMiGsKlf4u1QC.2Brvk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: c3cb23cb-2afa-4e06-80b9-43a90ce2679d X-Archives-Hash: 51e82fd6869d11ff2a054e5432b67d2a --Sig_/3JP+AMiGsKlf4u1QC.2Brvk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:17:30 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > it's 60. That seems a little high based on what you told me, but I > > have no reference value to compare it to from 2-3 weeks ago. =20 >=20 > well, in the last few days I haven't seen any swap usage at all, which > is how the system used to run! >=20 > Strange how the swappiness changed so dramatically in recent kernels. I wondered the same when I checked and saw that my computers were using 60 too. But when I googled about it I found references to a default of 60 from over a year ago. --=20 Neil Bothwick Despite the cost of living it remains popular. --Sig_/3JP+AMiGsKlf4u1QC.2Brvk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzIuXoACgkQum4al0N1GQMNbQCcCW5g4Yw6qSXQ0e/JArhP2G2Y 6PsAn0UPcSGHKq9lLsLDDEqJW5DcoWrF =rJqD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3JP+AMiGsKlf4u1QC.2Brvk--