From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-115861-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1P9Pso-0000eI-8l
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:14:42 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84CE7E07C3;
	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:13:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BDFE07C3
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:13:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zaphod.digimed.co.uk (zaphod.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F6558FBFC5
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 23:13:50 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 23:13:49 +0100
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout --> openrc ?
Message-ID: <20101022231349.1b4ef272@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4CC1F982.8030009@gmail.com>
References: <loom.20101022T040004-219@post.gmane.org>
	<20101022122901.6a54ef4c@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
	<0B6D45A7-8D0E-45AB-8578-FC8F265B8C49@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
	<201010222232.21958.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
	<4CC1F982.8030009@gmail.com>
Organization: Digital Media Production
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6cvs57 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667  FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/EjDz1kdds599/79LdY+uvAS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: f17d2ee1-a797-4f73-94ea-712cae897f04
X-Archives-Hash: 7641753cb9cf52b773eb5060354c62e3

--Sig_/EjDz1kdds599/79LdY+uvAS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:52:18 -0500, Dale wrote:

> That was what I recalled about the openrc discussion too.  It is coming=20
> but just not sure when.  Me, I'm not switching until it starts getting=20
> closer to that time.  It, like some of the newer versions of portage,=20
> appears to be stable and is used by many people but is not marked
> stable yet.  Both of those sort of confuse me sometimes.

You're mixing two different definitions of stable. Portage 2.2 is
certainly reliable, but it is anything but stable with a new version
coming out every day at the moment,.


--=20
Neil Bothwick

Stupid user error. Terminate user (Y/n) ?

--Sig_/EjDz1kdds599/79LdY+uvAS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzCDJ0ACgkQum4al0N1GQP2EACdH3qugdWRQt2Hu6Rnn/W8+6Yz
M9wAn1xXfBO++psDWDMiEgSN/EPe6/8z
=897s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/EjDz1kdds599/79LdY+uvAS--