[gentoo-user] LibreOffice

[gentoo-user] LibreOffice

[András Csányi]

Hi All,

I would like to know when will be part of portage the LibreOffice? I
know this is an unsupported software (I have found in Gentoo Forum
unsupported software part).

Thanks in advance!

ANdrás

-- 
- -
--  Csanyi Andras (Sayusi Ando)  -- http://sayusi.hu --
http://facebook.com/andras.csanyi
--  ""Trust in God and keep your gunpowder dry!" - Cromwell

Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice

[Andrés Becerra Sandoval]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 628 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:05 AM, András Csányi <sayusi.ando@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I would like to know when will be part of portage the LibreOffice? I
> know this is an unsupported software (I have found in Gentoo Forum
> unsupported software part).
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> ANdrás
>
> --
> - -
> --  Csanyi Andras (Sayusi Ando)  -- http://sayusi.hu --
> http://facebook.com/andras.csanyi
> --  ""Trust in God and keep your gunpowder dry!" - Cromwell
>
>
Hello,

I have libreoffice-bin installed from rion overlay and it is working fine
for the moment.


-- 
  Andrés Becerra Sandoval

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1134 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice

[Florian Philipp]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 976 bytes --]

Am 15.10.2010 16:19, schrieb Andrés Becerra Sandoval:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:05 AM, András Csányi <sayusi.ando@gmail.com
> <mailto:sayusi.ando@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I would like to know when will be part of portage the LibreOffice? I
>> know this is an unsupported software (I have found in Gentoo Forum
>> unsupported software part).
>> 
[...]
>
> Hello,
> 
> I have libreoffice-bin installed from rion overlay and it is working
> fine for the moment. 
> 
[...]

There is also what looks like a source build (haven't tried it) in
geki-overlay.

Just out of curiosity: I thought LibreOffice is just a renamed
OpenOffice because of trademark issues with Oracle and not even the name
is fixed for the moment. Doesn't that mean that the OpenOffice ebuilds
will slowly migrate to LibreOffice, anyway? When I look at the version
number, OpenOffice is currently at 3.2.1 and LibreOffice from
geki-overlay at 3.2.99.1.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice

[Alan McKinnon]

Apparently, though unproven, at 19:30 on Friday 15 October 2010, Florian 
Philipp did opine thusly:

> Am 15.10.2010 16:19, schrieb Andrés Becerra Sandoval:
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:05 AM, András Csányi <sayusi.ando@gmail.com
> > 
> > <mailto:sayusi.ando@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >> 
> >> I would like to know when will be part of portage the LibreOffice? I
> >> know this is an unsupported software (I have found in Gentoo Forum
> >> unsupported software part).
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have libreoffice-bin installed from rion overlay and it is working
> > fine for the moment.
> 
> [...]
> 
> There is also what looks like a source build (haven't tried it) in
> geki-overlay.
> 
> Just out of curiosity: I thought LibreOffice is just a renamed
> OpenOffice because of trademark issues with Oracle and not even the name
> is fixed for the moment. Doesn't that mean that the OpenOffice ebuilds
> will slowly migrate to LibreOffice, anyway? When I look at the version
> number, OpenOffice is currently at 3.2.1 and LibreOffice from
> geki-overlay at 3.2.99.1.


LibreOffice is a fork of OpenOffice.org. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. 
Especially don't let Oracle tell you otherwise.

Read the press release on The Document Foundation's website for the truth.



-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

[gentoo-user] Re: LibreOffice

[Nuno J. Silva]

Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> writes:

> Apparently, though unproven, at 19:30 on Friday 15 October 2010, Florian 
> Philipp did opine thusly:
>
[...]
>> Just out of curiosity: I thought LibreOffice is just a renamed
>> OpenOffice because of trademark issues with Oracle and not even the name
>> is fixed for the moment. Doesn't that mean that the OpenOffice ebuilds
>> will slowly migrate to LibreOffice, anyway? When I look at the version
>> number, OpenOffice is currently at 3.2.1 and LibreOffice from
>> geki-overlay at 3.2.99.1.
>
>
> LibreOffice is a fork of OpenOffice.org. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. 
> Especially don't let Oracle tell you otherwise.
>
> Read the press release on The Document Foundation's website for the truth.

From what I've been reading, it is indeed a fork of OpenOffice which now
happens to have just the code from OpenOffice and go-oo.

But the future will tell us if there will be enough differences to
justify an ebuild. As it's now a different project, it's pretty possible
differences will arise.

It also depends on whether Oracle and go-oo will want to incorporate
changes from LibreOffice.

-- 
Nuno J. Silva
gopher://sdf-eu.org/1/users/njsg

Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice

[Alan McKinnon]

Apparently, though unproven, at 15:05 on Friday 15 October 2010, András Csányi 
did opine thusly:

> Hi All,
> 
> I would like to know when will be part of portage the LibreOffice? I
> know this is an unsupported software (I have found in Gentoo Forum
> unsupported software part).

It will go into portage when someone puts it there and it gets stabilised.

You want it there. So, when are you going to become a gentoo dev and commit 
the first ebuild?

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Friday 15 October 2010, András Csányi wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I would like to know when will be part of portage the LibreOffice? I
> know this is an unsupported software (I have found in Gentoo Forum
> unsupported software part).
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> ANdrás

a) when there is a release?

b) 'libreoffice' - which is competing for the title 'most idiotic name ever' - 
is based on go-openoffice. Gentoo already uses  the go-openoffice patches.

Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice

[BRM]

----- Original Message ----

> From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
> b) 'libreoffice' - which is  competing for the title 'most idiotic name ever' - 
>
> is based on  go-openoffice. Gentoo already uses  the go-openoffice patches.

Based on what I read on the Document Foundation's website, I do not believe it 
is based on Go-OOo at all; but that they just accepted the patches in 
"mainline".
From their FAQ (http://www.documentfoundation.org/faq/) - emphasis mine:


Q: What does this announcement mean to other derivatives of OpenOffice.org? 
A: We want The Document Foundation to be open to code contributions  from as 
many people as possible. We are delighted to announce that
the  enhancements produced by the Go-OOo team will bemergedinto  LibreOffice, 
effective immediately. We hope that others will follow  suit. 


Ben

[gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[Roger Cahn]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 407 bytes --]

hey all,

4.4.6-gentoo, amd64, libreoffice-5.1.2.2

Since I have done what was said,
I have in make.conf   LINGUAS="fr fr_FR"   L1ON="fr"

Libreoffice is in English. I would like to have it again in French.
I updated a short time ago    app-office/libreoffice-l10n-5.1.2.2
with  L10N having -fr instead of +fr
I think it is the reason of this.

How could I solve the problem ?
Thank you for your help
Roger

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 757 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[Franz Fellner]

On Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:51:17 +0200, Roger Cahn <roger.cahn@free.fr> wrote:
> hey all,
> 
> 4.4.6-gentoo, amd64, libreoffice-5.1.2.2
> 
> Since I have done what was said,
> I have in make.conf   LINGUAS="fr fr_FR"   L1ON="fr"

It's "L ten N" Instead of "L one o N" (Zero instead of upper letter o).

> 
> Libreoffice is in English. I would like to have it again in French.
> I updated a short time ago    app-office/libreoffice-l10n-5.1.2.2
> with  L10N having -fr instead of +fr
> I think it is the reason of this.
> 
> How could I solve the problem ?
> Thank you for your help
> Roger
> 
> 
-- 

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[Roger Cahn]

It's "L ten N" Instead of "L one o N" (Zero instead of upper letter o).

Yes, it's a zero in  L10N !

eix libreoffice  shows

[I] app-office/libreoffice-l10n

Installed versions:  5.1.2.2^s(10:12:41 27/06/2016)(-offlinehelp 
L10N="-af -am ........ -fr

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[Arve Barsnes]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 501 bytes --]

On 2 July 2016 at 10:44, Roger Cahn <roger.cahn@free.fr> wrote:

>
> It's "L ten N" Instead of "L one o N" (Zero instead of upper letter o).
>
> Yes, it's a zero in  L10N !
>
> eix libreoffice  shows
>
> [I] app-office/libreoffice-l10n
>
> Installed versions:  5.1.2.2^s(10:12:41 27/06/2016)(-offlinehelp L10N="-af
> -am ........ -fr
>
> Yes, now check your make.conf entry, it seems you used the letter 'o'
there, and not a zero. Fix that, and maybe your libreoffice will be in
french again :)

Arve

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 929 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[Roger Cahn]

Yes, now check your make.conf entry, it seems you used the letter 'o' 
there, and not a zero. Fix that, and maybe your libreoffice will be in 
french again :)

It is a zero and not a o
But in make.conf I writed a new L10N
and I compiled app-office/libreoffice-l10n again
There was nomore -fr in it
And now I have libreoffice again in French.
Thank you for your answers :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[Bertram Scharpf]

On Saturday, 02. Jul 2016, 08:19:12 +0000, Franz Fellner wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:51:17 +0200, Roger Cahn <roger.cahn@free.fr> wrote:
> > 
> > I have in make.conf   LINGUAS="fr fr_FR"   L1ON="fr"
> 
> It's "L ten N" Instead of "L one o N" (Zero instead of upper letter o).

localization   (Br. localisation)
 \________/
    10 letters


Bertram

-- 
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[Peter Humphrey]

On Saturday 02 Jul 2016 14:56:23 Bertram Scharpf wrote:

> localization   (Br. localisation)
>  \________/
>     10 letters

Pardon? In decimal arithmetic I make that 12 letters.

-- 
Rgds
Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 352 bytes --]

On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:53:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:

> > localization   (Br. localisation)
> >  \________/
> >     10 letters  
> 
> Pardon? In decimal arithmetic I make that 12 letters.

It's l ten letters n, in the same way that internationalisation became
i18n.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Drop your carrier .. we have you surrounded

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[Peter Humphrey]

On Sunday 03 Jul 2016 22:58:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:53:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > localization   (Br. localisation)
> > > 
> > >  \________/
> > >  
> > >     10 letters
> > 
> > Pardon? In decimal arithmetic I make that 12 letters.
> 
> It's l ten letters n, in the same way that internationalisation became
> i18n.

Ah, I see. You learn something every day - if you're not careful!

-- 
Rgds
Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 276 bytes --]

On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 09:37:12 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:

> > It's l ten letters n, in the same way that internationalisation became
> > i18n.  
> 
> Ah, I see. You learn something every day - if you're not careful!

It's basically a form of leet speak.


N2l B6k

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

[waltdnes]

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:37:12AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
> On Sunday 03 Jul 2016 22:58:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:53:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > localization   (Br. localisation)
> > > > 
> > > >  \________/
> > > >  
> > > >     10 letters
> > > 
> > > Pardon? In decimal arithmetic I make that 12 letters.
> > 
> > It's l ten letters n, in the same way that internationalisation became
> > i18n.
> 
> Ah, I see. You learn something every day - if you're not careful!

  Another sig for Neil Bothwick's collection.

-- 
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org>
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications