From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P67P7-0003Kw-37 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:54:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8D90E08C3; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E607E08C3 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so1183760ewy.40 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:53:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=/mSa8d0fOggjI9mgw1i98iFWhQu6tPxwSsjRqGQwVdc=; b=sAD0x5L4ABw9+sAVdKm/8MkYZQr+h37SJJggkhf07oblAn9rPt1CGXTHN34ImN8di8 cPIiJHecV/3nItDf3t1RPnYWbFE9Bygkyb4cTZrSTUPlu9MV3o+N1AQEFFy6JUXm52sh /o1RD8XiZHvs/WS6/kb2Q4efXghKfrLxSz81c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=PKu6edXaG/ldPczZh+XR8IabrEY6DfhIwMDu2AkllD2nLEUN70oVUM/CK3XYc5Tiif O6smZ/wVFB8a70dDLuk5G7SqvyOVImLVJtVMN48bqN5Zn6i54ALAcfhhunXY6i/1m+dE eNSeiHwfRVK58iqj39Ge/3X3prAFd9eoX31K8= Received: by 10.213.28.18 with SMTP id k18mr1015786ebc.43.1286999616110; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-215-2-42.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.215.2.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm5459716eeh.17.2010.10.13.12.53.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:53:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] anyone use 389ds? Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:54:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-ck-r4; KDE/4.5.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <201010131808.51181.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010132154.03404.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: e4ce4a6a-238b-4ffb-a544-9d15ae04c92d X-Archives-Hash: c8d4fbe0d25d919513bb6659fbaf8785 Apparently, though unproven, at 19:08 on Wednesday 13 October 2010, James did opine thusly: > > # eix -e libtool > > [I] sys-devel/libtool > > Available versions: > > (1.3) 1.3.5 > > (1.5) **1.5.26 (~)1.5.26-r1 2.2.6b **9999 > > (2) (~)2.2.8-r1 2.2.10{tbz2} **2.4 > > {test vanilla} > > Installed versions: 2.2.10(2){tbz2}(12:30:40 10/06/10)(-vanilla) > > Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/ > > Description: A shared library tool for developers > > > > > > Do you have libtool:1.5 installed? Any effect? > > Looks like I have libtool 2.2.10 (like you) installed; should I mask > the newer version and attempt a 1.5 installation? > > eix -e libtool > [I] sys-devel/libtool > Available versions: > (1.3) 1.3.5 > (1.5) **1.5.26 ~1.5.26-r1 2.2.6b **9999 > (2) ~2.2.8-r1 2.2.10 **2.4 > {test vanilla} > Installed versions: 2.2.10(2)(07:58:35 AM 10/03/2010)(-vanilla) > Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/ > Description: A shared library tool for developers > > Won't that affect other packages, too? 389ds wants libtool 2.2.6b which is in SLOT 1.5. You have 2.2.10 which is SLOT 2. So they can install side-by-side without colliding. You'd have to ensure 389ds uses the correct libtool and that other packages don't get confused. I have no idea how to do that - every time I look into libtool I come away thinking it's an unholy mess that should never have been suffered to spawn. This directly results in my skills with it remaining at zero. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com