From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P1XRm-0001hD-MF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 04:42:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AA2EE0D7B; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 04:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC263E0D7B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 04:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so2785275fxm.40 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:41:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=ztJpEUXOMbIu8OSyGxp4QGxl4DKBZZsW9vVLsUCEuyk=; b=L+3QYF8a2+lR2uG9uJPI5a2+6JZMQIn7CtLtf31Fsm0YJHxtecMFWKmpzx8H1YVgMu 1+n+HSmOup9+ZFAv9gCj0mqAUtL5RJ/BqcIEKaX9Q2Fv8wWswlDLrcuqGUQivrvkxYUV xj7/r6LocyZw0lJB8JhkvUtwTm6vvLpMaxVqk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=ZXNemtD30odUGEUR6ls+IRA1t21fGhMnm1mzwKMXV4LaNy6M5Pn8ecOVSCLFEB9RbK igCTXxB4tDS7GZsWJ8w/vauQCBt7bFs82qwM8nrnx665+kdSXnsHLAUW112ylUwM/NYY xPmmS9OQxB4HHQzhKKfn7kL58+rcHZ6ItjEO8= Received: by 10.223.115.13 with SMTP id g13mr4858619faq.9.1285908104948; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from energy.localnet (p5DCC09C0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.9.192]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r4sm368607faa.43.2010.09.30.21.41.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:41:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Normal disk speed? Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 06:41:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34.7r4; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <201009301853.28825.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010010641.38701.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 363173d6-4ecd-443f-98ee-d669bb4d7436 X-Archives-Hash: 51db0307ebcd0b43996a0d2004c27099 On Friday 01 October 2010, Adam Carter wrote: > > Your harddisk seeks, everything is slow. > > > > So does that then mean that my options are; > > 1. Defragment, so there is less seeking > 2. Get an SSD > > Since 2 is too expensive for a decent size drive, is there anything i can > do about 1 without a backup and restore operation? Or will the > fragmentation be very small on reiser3 anyway (i mount with notail) so I > should just accept things as they are. every fs fragments over the course of time. Some more, some less. So as long as you have harddisks: get used to the seeking penalty.