From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OvE2I-0002EF-D6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:45:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E379E0970; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.167]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA56E0970 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.133] (helo=smtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvE1q-0008Mv-Kz for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:45:22 +0200 Received: from 53532a97.cable.casema.nl ([83.83.42.151] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvE1m-0004oz-EZ for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:45:18 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE079B9 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:46:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from data.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (data.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NIMtOORNQ62y for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:46:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eve.localnet (eve.lan.antarean.org [10.20.13.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 502803E for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:46:19 +0200 (CEST) From: "J. Roeleveld" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: what's going on with updates ? Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:45:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20100913183723.57A77E0746@pigeon.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20100913183723.57A77E0746@pigeon.gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201009132045.16523.joost@antarean.org> X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1OvE1m-0004oz-EZ X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-2.599, vereist 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: joost@antarean.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: 26b19620-2c67-4ba2-84e9-a95ed6607255 X-Archives-Hash: 4b0c0d141423dc15b4914f7e9411746b On Monday 13 September 2010 20:37:13 St=E9phane Guedon wrote: > On Monday 13 September 2010 20:28:07 J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Monday 13 September 2010 20:15:24 St=E9phane Guedon wrote: > > > On Monday 13 September 2010 21:06:48 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > > > On 09/13/2010 09:15 AM, St=E9phane Guedon wrote: > > > > > Since few days ( two or three ?), every time I launch emerge, > > > > > it's > > > > > saying me it needs an update of portage itself. > > > > > In plus, I have upgraded udev at least two times (160>161>162 > > > > > today)... > > > > >=20 > > > > > Plus, I have had two warning message concerning updates : sudo > > > > > and an > > > > > other... > > > > >=20 > > > > > what's going on ? Is somebody founding security holes "=E0 la > > > > > pelle" > > > > > (french expression). > > > >=20 > > > > emerge -al1 portage > > > >=20 > > > > (Note the "l" option.) > > >=20 > > > today, one more ! portage to the 2.1.9.4 if I remember exactly ! > >=20 > > Do you have "ACCEPT_KEYWORDS" set to something starting with a "~..."? > >=20 > > If yes, then you can expect regular updates to further "unstable" > > versions. > >=20 > > -- > > Joost >=20 > yes, of course... but... one release per day ? strange isn't it ? I wouldn't expect people to run a Gentoo system with all packages on unstab= le. I tend to only select specific packages as unstable when I really need that= =20 version. I wouldn't be surprised to have to upgrade a substantial set of packages on= a=20 daily basis with that setting. Why do you specify you want the latest versions and then get surprised when= =20 you get new updates on a daily basis? =2D- Joost