From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-114732-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1OuE0d-0006jf-LB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:31:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E2CAE0925; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xena.bway.net (xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39344E0925 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67820 invoked by uid 0); 11 Sep 2010 00:31:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.bway.net) (216.220.96.11) by smtp.bway.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 11 Sep 2010 00:31:52 -0000 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:31:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Ajai Khattri <ajai@bway.net> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What's the story with 2.6.35 kernel? In-Reply-To: <i6eg14$1o7$1@dough.gmane.org> Message-ID: <20100910203038.V55879@shell.bway.net> References: <20100910181417.T55879@shell.bway.net> <i6eg14$1o7$1@dough.gmane.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: 17a412cd-4b36-47bb-ba6d-1d03571f8cbb X-Archives-Hash: fc9e822a6b5c676e674dd15e08581172 On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/11/2010 01:18 AM, Ajai Khattri wrote: >> >> I upgraded several machines and some failed to boot 2.6.35, they just >> hang after grub starts loading the kernel. > > If you updated from 2.6.34 or even 33, then there shouldn't be a problem; > "make oldconfig" should have worked OK and presented new/changed config > options in a sane way. On this particular box I was updating from 2.6.24 to 2.6.35 and I always use 'make silentoldconfig' when upgrading. -- A