From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqv2Z-0002wW-80 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:40:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D5DBE0C3A; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 21:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB03E0C3A for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 21:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so5356043eyf.40 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:39:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=sKT1txByGXkV64YCf9bWdUdWlheFyNY43pECghJ8t/U=; b=HNmH36fcukIn2JVsLSpM45hnXTSadfhGWTcAaCkERLfJNZE79kScU3WudLlCjMcBXt b3k2kVBJpoxLAT7HC7avB8e35RAZbPbaAaCUMM5S0XMrYmbmjQIxlNa8G4T6J6uPKAt7 RB3tJttP+tChpnSyyM/cmoDZddK2JuEw7MjeQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=OY04HB9GvgjhZrqSo+mWkKRaB+byybY0QlwUhXAZVJ/tkOoWTEf0lAoXvZnpLh374y hPD3JAxIJfZBo72W337LEJg6ZB/U7OBS25ExgI0UL7oRF2kPQVzvLdxxksIpZX8kzAdI oOcCwkTVr4nCVKmWREfOf0v0wJtM789DY9RBs= Received: by 10.216.10.5 with SMTP id 5mr8392758weu.81.1283377188329; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w29sm6508601weq.42.2010.09.01.14.39.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:39:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Proper way of updating mysql from 5.0.90-r2 to 5.1.50? Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:38:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4C7D3C94.2070602@gmail.com> <201009012318.51180.wonko@wonkology.org> <4C7EC4D3.1070807@libertytrek.org> In-Reply-To: <4C7EC4D3.1070807@libertytrek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1337845.YVmzD3T6ie"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009012239.49097.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 0682f4c1-4633-4e1b-a968-1b3cfddaf449 X-Archives-Hash: 1033e31d843a29e020f9016a24400599 --nextPart1337845.YVmzD3T6ie Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 01 September 2010 22:25:39 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-09-01 5:18 PM, Alex Schuster wrote: > > I think it's not an urgent problem when this happens. With portage > > 2.2 and the preserve-libs FEATURE, >=20 > You are assuming everyone runs unstable portage?? I'm running vanilla here, so will run revdep-rebuild when I get a minute. = =20 Until then I downgraded, because I was being shouted at ... O_O =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1337845.YVmzD3T6ie Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkx+yCUACgkQVTDTR3kpaLbVXgCfQZQNSRg9nnBz+I6x3iJTgnhZ eTcAnRU5rgBNjolxJrqjTzH2WWdsKZaN =0OvA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1337845.YVmzD3T6ie--