From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ojxjc-0004lP-Nc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:08:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C11F3E09DC for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA464E09C4 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so1044285eyf.40 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:34:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=mIjO87+mzi8dqOlB3RPb7oYuQWZ2ee2fLevIMC2NTT4=; b=BGhZn4AxUWkbov05z/3S8gcztzrzwy8R5FG9y3uRVUi4V6b7haTxW0+vw61uCqm84A jNByMt027zF41+Iyak/AqcGmK/6hv72pVw4cl2eo+R0zkfZtUktFx6/8mQtZRc7x5gJJ p63naNYZZb5J02npnpexgph3oZn6b3p6e1rgU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=snTyepBoEbheieWYBX5xHv8PDb1903K9ybPw6IHloKVaXOar5Ha5kKH/z/X19FM5F+ dZv6NXAxc+hm1QtOgEnabv5nhR1k0OjkWXhrwiHCU1epumgf91DaLPW/pbzs4hJMpPJB ZJyXx658wH2HXDIn8HcEcv44gNhtp8DyD33K4= Received: by 10.213.27.143 with SMTP id i15mr927311ebc.38.1281717278109; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-183-170.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.183.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8sm4474537eeh.2.2010.08.13.09.34.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:34:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge conflict Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:31:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-ck-r1; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20100813140452.GA8350@BiggerBoxer> <201008131517.50195.joost@antarean.org> <20100813153623.61cb8bf5@stelf-pc> In-Reply-To: <20100813153623.61cb8bf5@stelf-pc> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008131831.36852.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 08975e4e-791e-462f-87b2-78f994fa582a X-Archives-Hash: 4992cd0988b912e632cc8bf37228737d On Friday 13 August 2010 15:36:23 Daniel Wagener wrote: > This script is hopefully not the hack, that is said to be a problem in > the future? > > http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2010/06/29/stable-users-libpng-update When flameyes says to do something X in regard to a build, and someone else says to do something different, then in almost all cases (regardless of how authoritative the other person sounds), you should do what flameeyes says. ESPECIALLY the blog entry Daniel mentioned. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com