From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OeXyk-0008P0-0L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:37:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB01FE098E; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26C3E098E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56B3DEBD5 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:36:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wkni8H9ZM+u3 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:36:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from humphrey.ukfsn.org (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA917DEBCF for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:36:17 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] mysql use flag witout server, using only client libaries Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:36:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4C519635.8090203@krasko.sk> <201007291717.15791.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <4C51A9FD.4020203@krasko.sk> In-Reply-To: <4C51A9FD.4020203@krasko.sk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007291936.16564.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 71d1ebc7-c0b4-467a-a07d-1a31164f5419 X-Archives-Hash: c5572784e18b89fef6673639b1b7edd3 On Thursday 29 July 2010 17:19:09 Tomas Krasnican wrote: > I haven't see any reason to run mysql server localy, when all of > applications are using external box as the database server. So, I > looking for the another solution of this "problem". As Alan said, installing the server doesn't cost a lot, especially compared with the personal cost of finding a way to exclude it while still keeping the client. And as long as you don't add mysqld to any run level, it doesn't consume any CPU cycles: it just sits there on your disk being ignored. You were right to put "problem" in quotation marks. -- Rgds Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.