From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ObwNU-0005HX-T7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:04:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 491CDE09BE for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8661AE08CA for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so3529511ewy.40 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:32:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=RMrKrhch64umV1waiPui8mrBO5yCRnSdG1c3vp4TlMg=; b=P4LG16i3obNLeOxnFSaXQwEIBjcCaeDkdcvM+81Z2P4KhDgR3F38aajuoSw5cJfKQw CiSI/Axb1tP5GjRbIYOB092H2oGrcZ2usj+3N4PV+ge5kkrZ0zGNNswSQ5rlzQ6+Rp/O bvd0mWc7qNsS2ufl6pxCZWowNLsTfZOr+zCnY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=eejP032s1Viig4TEPomMOx9O/so0orMBYXpOiYFTjjJPxUy73FGl9DxvMulZubJ5r4 KoFxXB28HODgFHX+Eh93idjSOt3ZmtWdarWutpPRrnWYZVDopyc2HpJtXlAljswR2lnc ayz6/DhjRyZ7MKMuhRs1InxaWrV8nGJ47DlPM= Received: by 10.213.33.73 with SMTP id g9mr1831294ebd.46.1279805537607; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (dustpuppy.is.co.za [196.14.169.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm55237028eeh.23.2010.07.22.06.32.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:32:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SPF & sendmail: howto? Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:29:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-ck-r1; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4C474FD3.5060906@gmail.com> <87oce0awro.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007221529.02869.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 38205b50-035c-46ab-babe-e9454329833f X-Archives-Hash: 3de8878d7e19273074708e07c96b528e On Thursday 22 July 2010 14:37:04 Mr. Jarry wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > I assume you have a perfectly legitimate reason for still using sendmail > > in > > > this day and age? > > For ~10 years I've been a satisfied sendmail-user. Does it count for a > legitimate reason? Yes it does. Most extant sendmail users in my experience have it because "it came with the CD". Or they have a pointy haired boss who doesn't actually USE it, but insists that the staff do. Such folk are much better off with an alternate. I just needed to know which camp you were in. [snip] > Finally someone who does not suggest me to switch to other MTA! > btw, It is strange, there is a milter for SenderID (which iirc is in some > way > close to Microsoft) in portage tree, but nothing for openSPF. I will try to > make an ebuild. Maybe there are still more "real unix admins" using > old'n'good sendmail. But no flame over "which MTA is better", please. > (anyway, we all know Sendmail is the best! :-) Now you have your answer -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com