From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OV5jQ-0005v9-9i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:38:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE2A3E0BD0; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 16:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A466E0BD0 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 16:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb39 with SMTP id 39so650655wyb.40 for ; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:37:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=5BEOe0j1suA5tP0mg7qbLhTpFVRoosPNS4cXJ5SalxE=; b=PMdLRA0RhY5oFuGCdCo4MK0f2V0sxhMHt6kyRF24jUgqRf6yP5QJaslN2hs1aMbUnb NUbMyoL+JaVx0qDImscHq0q2jzu7etBHrjH7hQ1ymJP19/aA2vhEsFB0/EqjqZr7CHyo 2PhMXs/wuRJEQHKCNrC4HbEvDbNl3Ag8H3x5c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=a6C+4LhkMCTO+LCTIxxePhORZLqMCqONs/bJQw1d/usnpD8pJLOuWWnGuyqMy0UW7A 4QVSm1E9N9WkrV7ABryx+egd6iT7x5jerc3nhKuorDgU4Ckmf1T4xNdA0Uy/n+c+IHZm WYbCj64FLR9HROs4LYI/AZEWEVP2rZ0gTXOVY= Received: by 10.227.157.142 with SMTP id b14mr532474wbx.136.1278175057978; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a27sm15114297wbe.18.2010.07.03.09.37.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:37:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 17:37:36 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <20100702005433.GK9344@vidovic> <4C2DF0EA.6090308@libertytrek.org> <201007031155.12818.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201007031155.12818.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart39955214.9GT7z55joS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007031737.37158.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: c02f2b02-818c-479e-aa5f-9a2fd3d8bda1 X-Archives-Hash: 84c4be1459517ccbc0a068dd5298b134 --nextPart39955214.9GT7z55joS Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 03 July 2010 11:55:02 Mick wrote: > On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote: > > On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing > > > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists > > > I use don't do that. > > >=20 > > > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy > >=20 > > -10 this is plain wrong... > >=20 > > Use a mail client that has 'Reply-To-List' function. > >=20 > > Thunderbird's works very well no, so there is an excellent > > cross-platform mail client available that implements this > > functionality... > >=20 > > > as it permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the > > > whole mailing list. > > >=20 > > > What do you think about changing of policy? > >=20 > > +1, but not for the same reasons... > >=20 > > Before TB implemented Reply-To-List, I preferred lists that munged the > > Reply-To, but no longer. >=20 > Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have > posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly > responded has for some reason cc'd me in the reply. If I try to reply to > it the post will not go to the list, but the person that emailed me.=20 > Pressing 'l' in kmail just brings up an empty to field. This seems to > happen only with some replies. Will keep an eye out for it to see if it > is consistent. OK, just got this baby from Alan: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =46rom: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Flash stopped working after Firefox 3.6.3- >3.6.4 update. Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:37:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.34-ck-r1; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Mick References: =20 <20100702095121.76fe5102@core2duo.fabnetwork>=20 <201007031230.55562.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201007031230.55562.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=3D"utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201007031337.53868.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: =20 X-KMail-SignatureState: =20 X-KMail-MDN-Sent: =20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D and amidst the headers there's no usual mailing list IDs et al, as is usual= ly=20 the case: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D So, when I enter "l" the response is set directly to Alan, instead of Gento= o=20 Users M/L. Alan, any idea why this is so? Do you intentionally copy me in your respon= ses=20 to the list? =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart39955214.9GT7z55joS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwvZ1EACgkQVTDTR3kpaLZUoACcDQ1qaWolToJ/RDcBYQ0AiECp tPsAn0WyPm12/+FCqn953qgWhgN5j8kC =bwXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart39955214.9GT7z55joS--